Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Date
Msg-id 479DEDF5.4090909@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at  9:02 AM, in message
>>>>         
> <87odb7s45i.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote: 
>  
>   
>> Perhaps we should have some form of escape hatch for pg_dump to request real
>> physical order when dumping clustered tables.
>>     
>  
> It would seem reasonable to me for pg_dump to use ORDER BY to select
> data from clustered tables.
>  
> I don't see a general case for worrying about the order of rows
> returned by queries which lack an ORDER BY clause.
>  
>
>   

What will be the performance hit from doing that?

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al