On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 13:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at> writes:
> > One more question. It would be possible that a session that turned off
> > the synchronized_seqscans still be a pack leader for other later
> > sessions.
> > Do/should we consider that ?
>
> Seems like a reasonable thing to consider ... for 8.4.
Definitely. I thought about this the other day and decided it had some
strange behaviour in some circumstances, so wouldn't be desirable
overall.
-- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
