Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date
Msg-id 200801311605.18796.dfontaine@hi-media.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> error, rather than something people could override with -i.

Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump
from an 8.2.5 installation?

--
dim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)