Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Chernow
Subject Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Date
Msg-id 4783FB03.80500@esilo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> That said, we have been a little dismayed in the lack of comment.
> 
> Personally, I'm ignoring this thread, as well as the one on
> partitioning, because I'm up to my arse in 8.3-release alligators.
> I'm going to try hard not to think about any 8.4 development issues
> until 8.3 is actually out the door and we branch for 8.4 development.
> 
> I can't say how many other people are equally pressed for time ...
> but seeing the minimal attention that seems to be getting paid to
> open 8.3 issues, it doesn't look to me like the community as a whole
> has a lot of spare cycles right now.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> 

Thanks for the heads up.  We had a feeling the 8.3 crunch was a factor.  We don't want to slow that down because we
wereare waiting for 8.3 to 
 
perform yet another mysql to postgresql migration :)

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4