Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10801271022w56430218pe3cd342e55763686@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 27, 2008 7:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It could be PGC_USERSET, afaics.

If so, it seems like a good idea even if it's just for debugging purposes.

--
Guillaume


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al