Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Could we dump it when it's non-default only? That way the people that
>> *have* set a custom comment on it will still get it restored, just a
>> failure in this case. The majority of people who *haven't* set a comment
>> will not have the problem at all.
>
> The patch seems ugly enough without wiring in knowledge of what the
> standard comment is :-(
I guess...
> We don't dump non-default comments on other system objects either,
> so I don't think it's out of line to suppress the one on schema public.
The distinction then is if "public" is actually a system object. I
would've considered it a non-system object, just that it happens to be
created by default.
Anyway. I don't see it as a big point - as long as we make sure it's
documented in some way somewhere. I doubt any application would actually
fail or have any kind of real problems because we miss the comment on
the public schema.
//Magnus
