Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Date
Msg-id 162867790801170843r3ec4b6d4qc9584e861cb281a6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> I'm sorry I thought we were developing PostgreSQL.
>

we develop PostgreSQL, but why create own syntax for all? Why? Only so
we develop PostgreSQL? We have different implementation and different
limit, but why create different syntax, I don't understand. It's like
Microsoft. Lot of things are little bit incompatible.

Pavel

> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4