Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Bertheau
Subject Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Date
Msg-id 684362e10801271207o54e6f2f1n93af228ae0ff6ca2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
2008/1/28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>
> Do we have nominations for a name?  The first idea that comes to mind
> is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).

"synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more so
than "synchronized_scanning".

Markus

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gevik Babakhani"
Date:
Subject: MSVC Build error
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: what is suffix _P in gram.y