Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Date
Msg-id 200801311514.m0VFEwY24520@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> > Effect: we would stop receiving complaints that an old pg_dump can talk
> > to a server that most likely is incompatible with it.  People would
> > learn on the spot that they must install the newer pg_dump.
> 
> I think a more moderate measure might be to clarify the error message
> 
> "aborting because of version mismatch  (Use the -i option to proceed 
> anyway.)\n"
> 
> I'm not sure how many of the mentioned complaints we are getting, but the 
> error message might make people think that it's complaining because the 
> versions are not equal rather than that the versions are known not 
> compatible.

Agreed --- that error message is just prompting people to try something
they shouldn't and not explaining why.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died