-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:44:41 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> pl/PgSQL already is aimed at being Oracle compatible so why complain
> that the author wants to use Oracle syntax if possible. If you don't
> care, that is fine, but as a project we do, at least in helping people
> migrate to Postgres from other databases.
>
This appears to be the, "can't follow written points day". Magnus has
already given up on a thread on advocacy. I give up here.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHj5dmATb/zqfZUUQRAgtDAJ9H8igJII+kyAxarEFwtPMhe3GG+ACeLOjq
p9MZzOrDM2z3nDGw2H2c1Og=
=UnFv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
