Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume Smet
Subject Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Date
Msg-id 1d4e0c10801271115g2425c519q9e8ef989c51785ad@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 27, 2008 7:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Also, does anyone object to making pg_dump just disable it
> unconditionally?  Greg's original gripe only mentioned the case of
> clustered tables, but it'd be kind of a pain to make pg_dump turn it
> on and off again for different tables.  And I could see people
> complaining about pg_dump failing to preserve row order even in
> unclustered tables.

+1. I don't think it's worth it to enable it for non clustered tables
and it's always better to keep the order if we can.

--
Guillaume


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER and synchronized scans and pg_dump et al
Next
From: "Gevik Babakhani"
Date:
Subject: MSVC Build error