Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2008 9:07 PM, Markus Bertheau
> <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2008/1/28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>>> Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to
>>> mind is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).
>> "synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
>> keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more
>> so than "synchronized_scanning".
>
> synchronize_seqscans?
How about enable_syncscan, or enable_seqscan_sync? It's not strictly
something the influences the planner, but maybe it's similar enough to
justify a similar naming?
regards, Florian Pflug
