Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 September 2005

• 00:06   Re: Indexing dead tuples Simon Riggs
• 00:57   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Simon Riggs
• 01:42   TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Jaime Casanova
• 01:46   Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:47   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Alvaro Herrera
• 02:08   Re: Indexing dead tuples Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 02:30   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Andrew Dunstan
• 02:38   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:47   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 02:56   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Tom Lane
• 03:20   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Gavin Sherry
• 04:13   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Josh Berkus
• 04:15   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Josh Berkus
• 04:19   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew - Supernews
• 04:21   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Josh Berkus
• 04:22   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Andrew - Supernews
• 04:34   broken configure, broken makefile? Robert Treat
• 04:41   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 04:54   Re: broken configure, broken makefile? Gavin Sherry
• 05:16   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:37   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Hannu Krosing
• 07:21   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Dave Page
• 07:26   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:12   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Hannu Krosing
• 09:18   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Dennis Bjorklund
• 09:30   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Simon Riggs
• 09:33   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:47   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:57   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 12:42   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Tom Lane
• 12:50   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Tom Lane
• 13:09   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: broken configure, broken makefile? Tom Lane
• 13:22   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 13:29   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew - Supernews
• 13:34   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Alvaro Herrera
• 13:36   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 14:14   8.1beta, Subtle bug in COPY in Solaris systems Sergey E. Koposov
• 14:15   Re: broken configure, broken makefile? Robert Treat
• 15:00   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion William ZHANG
• 15:04   Re: broken configure, broken makefile? David Fetter
• 15:04   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Tom Lane
• 15:14   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion William ZHANG
• 15:19   Re: broken configure, broken makefile? Alvaro Herrera
• 15:21   Re: 8.1beta, Subtle bug in COPY in Solaris systems Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew - Supernews
• 15:45   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Simon Riggs
• 15:57   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Merlin Moncure
• 16:01   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:03   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Tom Lane
• 16:08   Version number in psql banner Peter Eisentraut
• 16:16   Using multi-locale support in glibc Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:17   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 16:29   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Simon Riggs
• 16:40   Re: 8.1beta, Subtle bug in COPY in Solaris systems Sergey E. Koposov
• 16:41   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Josh Berkus
• 16:46   Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types Tom Lane
• 16:49   PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3? Matt Miller
• 17:00   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew - Supernews
• 17:05   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew Dunstan
• 17:20   upgrade path / versioning roles Patrick Welche
• 17:25   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Josh Berkus
• 17:27   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Steve Atkins
• 17:46   Re: Version number in psql banner Alvaro Herrera
• 17:46   Re: Version number in psql banner Josh Berkus
• 17:49   Re: Version number in psql banner Darcy Buskermolen
• 18:06   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 18:08   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 18:10   Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:17   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: upgrade path / versioning roles Tom Lane
• 18:50   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas Andrew - Supernews
• 19:10   Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc Tom Lane
• 19:10   Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3? Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: upgrade path / versioning roles Tom Lane
• 19:34   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Version number in psql banner Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: upgrade path / versioning roles Patrick Welche
• 19:54   Re: Version number in psql banner aly.dharshi@telus.net
• 20:32   rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Allan Wang
• 20:47   GRANT/roles problem: grant is shown as from login role Tom Lane
• 20:49   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Marc G. Fournier
• 20:56   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:19   Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Tom Lane
• 21:23   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Andrew Dunstan
• 21:33   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc Tom Lane
• 21:54   Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Allan Wang
• 21:57   Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Tom Lane
• 22:10   Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names? Allan Wang
• 22:31   Re: Version number in psql banner Simon Riggs
• 22:33   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... Marc G. Fournier
• 22:58   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Matt Miller
• 23:18   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Tom Lane

2 September 2005

• 00:47   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: Pre-allocated free space for row Tom Lane
• 01:11   Avoid using swap in a cluster Ricardo Humphreys
• 01:13   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:58   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Matthew Miller
• 02:06   Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:06   Tracing I/O (was: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) Jim C. Nasby
• 02:09   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Matthew Miller
• 02:26   Re: Tracing I/O (was: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) Alvaro Herrera
• 03:11   Additional background daemon (was: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples) Jim C. Nasby
• 03:22   Re: Additional background daemon (was: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples) Tom Lane
• 03:51   Re: Additional background daemon (was: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples) Jim C. Nasby
• 04:06   Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: Version number in psql banner Jim C. Nasby
• 05:10   Re: Version number in psql banner Michael Fuhr
• 05:38   Re: typo? was: Version number in psql banner Tino Wildenhain
• 05:41   Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:36   Question about explain of index scan Hannu Krosing
• 13:04   Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:03   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Merlin Moncure
• 14:34   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Matt Miller
• 14:57   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Magnus Hagander
• 14:58   Re: Question about explain of index scan Alvaro Herrera
• 15:08   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Alvaro Herrera
• 15:14   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Greg Stark
• 15:15   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 15:22   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: GRANT/roles problem: grant is shown as from login role Stephen Frost
• 15:36   Re: Question about explain of index scan Hannu Krosing
• 15:39   Re: Question about explain of index scan Alvaro Herrera
• 15:44   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 15:47   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:41   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 16:44   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Tom Lane
• 16:54   dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Mark Wong
• 17:04   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:11   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch AgentM
• 17:21   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 17:40   Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: upgrade path / versioning roles Patrick Welche
• 18:29   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) elein@varlena.com (elein)
• 18:52   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax Andrew Dunstan
• 19:17   Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Dave Cramer
• 19:18   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT Josh Berkus
• 19:28   sequences TODO items Jaime Casanova
• 19:38   Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Mark Wong
• 19:39   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 19:50   Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Dave Cramer
• 19:52   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 19:57   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 20:22   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax Andrew Dunstan
• 20:27   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Josh Berkus
• 20:35   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Josh Berkus
• 20:42   Re: Procedural language definitions (was Re: 8.1 and syntax checking at create time) Tom Lane
• 20:42   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 20:56   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 20:57   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:57   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 20:58   Re: sequences TODO items Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: Ora2Pg (was PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT) Matt Miller
• 21:17   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 21:20   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 21:37   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 21:43   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with p.tch Alvaro Herrera
• 21:45   Re: sequences TODO items Alvaro Herrera
• 21:55   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 22:35   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Manfred Koizar

3 September 2005

• 00:41   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 05:16   Re: [PATCHES] Work-in-progress referential action trigger timing Stephan Szabo
• 08:59   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Manfred Koizar
• 09:43   Adding a new node to the executor Varun Kacholia
• 14:05   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 14:13   Re: Adding a new node to the executor Alvaro Herrera
• 14:46   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 14:48   Re: Adding a new node to the executor Bruce Momjian
• 15:08   core dump with last CVS Oleg Bartunov
• 15:47   Re: core dump with last CVS Tom Lane
• 20:35   Locale implementation questions (was: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:36   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Greg Stark
• 21:44   Re: Locale implementation questions (was: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch) Greg Stark

4 September 2005

• 04:33   OT: SCALE 4x -- Call For Papers Ilan Rabinovitch
• 12:31   Re: Locale implementation questions (was: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:26   Re: Locale implementation questions Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:01   Re: Locale implementation questions Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:01   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Peter Eisentraut
• 17:07   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Peter Eisentraut
• 19:02   Re: Locale implementation questions Greg Stark
• 19:44   Re: Question about explain of index scan Hannu Krosing
• 22:06   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Tom Lane
• 22:24   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: Question about explain of index scan Alvaro Herrera
• 23:11   Re: Question about explain of index scan Hannu Krosing
• 23:15   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: Locale implementation questions Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: Question about explain of index scan Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Petr Jelinek

5 September 2005

• 03:28   4D Geometry Chris Traylor
• 05:24   Re: 4D Geometry Chris Traylor
• 07:52   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:46   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 15:17   Postgres optimizer, repeated function calls Sergey E. Koposov
• 15:43   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Peter Eisentraut
• 18:25   inet increment with int Patrick Welche
• 18:42   Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch Patrick Welche
• 19:03   Re: inet increment with int Tom Lane
• 19:03   PostgreSQL configurable SSL key checking Simon de Hartog
• 19:09   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Simon Riggs
• 19:10   Re: inet increment with int Patrick Welche
• 19:18   Re: PostgreSQL configurable SSL key checking Tom Lane
• 19:26   Re: PostgreSQL configurable SSL key checking Alvaro Herrera
• 19:27   Re: 4D Geometry Tom Lane
• 19:36   Re: PostgreSQL configurable SSL key checking Alvaro Herrera
• 19:38   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: PostgreSQL configurable SSL key checking Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: 4D Geometry Chris Traylor
• 21:59   Install Darwin's locale library on your system :) Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:54   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett

6 September 2005

• 00:24   Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 00:32   release schedule Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: 4D Geometry Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: release schedule Tom Lane
• 02:27   Re: 4D Geometry Chris Traylor
• 03:24   Re: release schedule Marc G. Fournier
• 03:42   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion William ZHANG
• 03:45   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion William ZHANG
• 04:05   Re: release schedule Alvaro Herrera
• 04:27   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Joe Conway
• 05:07   How to add column in pg_class Rafaqat Ali
• 07:35   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Simon Riggs
• 07:47   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 12:12   Re: inet increment with int Patrick Welche
• 12:47   uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 14:59   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:05   Re: How to add column in pg_class Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Mark Wong
• 15:40   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: Simple tester for MVCC in PostgreSQL Matt Miller
• 16:07   Mysteriously lost values in nodes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:15   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 16:26   Re: Simple tester for MVCC in PostgreSQL Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:29   Re: dbt-4 (tpc-app) kit Dave Cramer
• 16:52   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 16:56   Re: 4D Geometry Peter Eisentraut
• 16:59   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 16:59   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 17:14   Re: Mysteriously lost values in nodes Alvaro Herrera
• 17:21   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Andrew Dunstan
• 17:24   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:27   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:37   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Andrew Dunstan
• 17:54   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:00   Re: Mysteriously lost values in nodes Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: Mysteriously lost values in nodes Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:44   purge hash table, how to? huaxin zhang
• 18:57   Re: Simple tester for MVCC in PostgreSQL Jim C. Nasby
• 19:12   Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion Jim C. Nasby
• 19:23   count(*) optimization huaxin zhang
• 19:44   Re: count(*) optimization Jonah H. Harris
• 19:48   Re: count(*) optimization Bruno Wolff III
• 19:52   need info about extensibility in other databases Oleg Bartunov
• 19:58   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 20:15   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 20:25   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 20:25   PITR on different hardware Rod Taylor
• 20:32   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 20:36   Re: purge hash table, how to? Tom Lane
• 20:49   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 20:49   Re: uuid type for postgres David Fetter
• 20:53   Re: PITR on different hardware Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: count(*) optimization Chris Browne
• 21:13   Re: need info about extensibility in other databases Michael Fuhr
• 21:15   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 21:18   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Jim C. Nasby
• 21:24   Re: PITR on different hardware Rod Taylor
• 21:29   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 21:35   Re: uuid type for postgres Greg Stark
• 21:36   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 21:54   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 21:55   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Jim C. Nasby
• 22:06   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 22:19   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 22:24   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 22:40   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 22:49   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Jim C. Nasby
• 23:02   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 23:09   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 23:27   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 23:34   Re: uuid type for postgres Greg Stark

7 September 2005

• 00:22   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster restart Tom Lane
• 00:59   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 01:15   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 01:22   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 01:37   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 01:47   Re: uuid type for postgres Dann Corbit
• 02:36   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 02:48   Re: inet increment with int Andrew - Supernews
• 02:55   Re: 4D Geometry Tim Allen
• 03:40   Re: uuid type for postgres Paul Ramsey
• 04:24   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: need info about extensibility in other databases Oleg Bartunov
• 05:15   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 05:31   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Jim C. Nasby
• 05:38   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster restart Jim C. Nasby
• 05:42   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 08:02   Testing for a shared library Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:12   Re: Testing for a shared library Dave Page
• 08:15   Re: Testing for a shared library Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:26   Re: Testing for a shared library Dave Page
• 08:57   Re: Testing for a shared library Teodor Sigaev
• 09:07   Re: Testing for a shared library Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:51   PL/PGSQL and drop/create table Teodor Sigaev
• 12:36   Re: inet increment with int Patrick Welche
• 12:59    James Robinson
• 13:36   Re: PL/PGSQL and drop/create table Michael Fuhr
• 13:37   Re: inet increment with int Sam Mason
• 14:27   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 14:47   Re: Testing for a shared library Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: uuid type for postgres Roman Neuhauser
• 16:02   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 17:06   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 17:31   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 17:38   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 17:44   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Jim C. Nasby
• 17:50   Re: uuid type for postgres Patrick Welche
• 17:51   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Alvaro Herrera
• 17:57   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Tom Lane
• 18:07   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 18:24   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Simon Riggs
• 18:33   PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Lee, Patricia S.
• 18:33   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 18:40   Re: uuid type for postgres nathan wagner
• 18:46   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Bruce Momjian
• 18:51   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:00   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Merlin Moncure
• 19:10   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: uuid type for postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 20:04   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster restart Alvaro Herrera
• 20:13   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 20:16   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:24   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 20:26   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Joshua D. Drake
• 20:38   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:42   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Andrew Dunstan
• 20:47   Re: uuid type for postgres Josh Berkus
• 20:50   Re: uuid type for postgres Alvaro Herrera
• 20:53   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW John DeSoi
• 20:53   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 20:56   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 21:03   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Andrew Dunstan
• 21:08   Re: uuid type for postgres Andrew Dunstan
• 21:22   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 21:34   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Petr Jelinek
• 21:35   Re: uuid type for postgres Tom Lane
• 21:50   pg_config/share_dir Andrew Dunstan
• 21:56   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Andrew Dunstan
• 22:14   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:38   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:47   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 22:52   Re: pg_config/share_dir Andrew Dunstan
• 23:01   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 23:02   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 23:06   initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 23:13   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:33   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 23:36   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:55   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut

8 September 2005

• 00:01   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 00:05   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 00:05   Re: pg_config/share_dir Darcy Buskermolen
• 00:18   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 00:26   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: pg_config/share_dir Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 00:58   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 01:08   Re: pg_config/share_dir Andrew Dunstan
• 01:11   PQ versions request message James William Pye
• 01:11   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Greg Stark
• 01:16   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 01:26   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 01:27   Re: pg_config/share_dir Tom Lane
• 01:36   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 01:54   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 01:54   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 01:54   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster restart Tom Lane
• 01:54   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 01:58   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 02:13   Re: initdb profiles Joshua D. Drake
• 02:13   Re: PQ versions request message Peter Eisentraut
• 02:13   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 02:13   Re: PQ versions request message Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 02:14   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 02:15   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 02:19   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 02:32   Re: PQ versions request message James William Pye
• 02:32   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 02:54   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update timezone data files to release 2005m of the zic database Tom Lane
• 03:06   Re: PQ versions request message Oliver Jowett
• 03:32   Re: initdb profiles Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:27   Re: PQ versions request message James William Pye
• 06:18   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 07:09   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update timezone data files to release 2005m of the zic database. Dave Page
• 07:41   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 09:04   Alternative variable length structure ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 09:56   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update timezone data files to release 2005m of the zic database. Larry Rosenman
• 11:10   Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta 
• 12:48   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Andrew Dunstan
• 13:01   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta 
• 13:18   Re: PQ versions request message Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: uuid type for postgres Greg Sabino Mullane
• 13:48   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 13:51   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Dave Cramer
• 14:04   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 14:05   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Dave Cramer
• 14:47   Re: initdb profiles aly.dharshi@telus.net
• 15:30   Re: pg_config/share_dir Darcy Buskermolen
• 15:32   Re: pg_config/share_dir Darcy Buskermolen
• 15:41   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:51   Re: initdb profiles Steve Atkins
• 16:12   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 16:20   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 16:32   Re: initdb profiles Andrew - Supernews
• 16:40   Re: uuid type for postgres mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 16:53   Re: Alternative variable length structure Josh Berkus
• 16:59   Re: initdb profiles Josh Berkus
• 17:09   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: uuid type for postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 17:16   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 17:21   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 17:34   Re: uuid type for postgres Bob Ippolito
• 17:34   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 17:36   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Simon Riggs
• 17:47   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster restart Jim C. Nasby
• 17:52   Re: Alternative variable length structure Rod Taylor
• 17:56   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:01   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1beta timezone question Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: pg_config/share_dir Andrew Dunstan
• 18:11   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 18:22   Re: Alternative variable length structure Andrew Dunstan
• 19:05   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 19:21   Re: Alternative variable length structure J. Andrew Rogers
• 19:31   Re: initdb profiles Josh Berkus
• 19:36   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:37   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Andrew Dunstan
• 19:41   Re: pg_config/share_dir Peter Eisentraut
• 19:45   Re: PQ versions request message James William Pye
• 19:46   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 19:53   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Thomas Hallgren
• 20:14   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: PQ versions request message Tom Lane
• 20:29   Re: initdb profiles Andrew - Supernews
• 20:30   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Dave Cramer
• 20:31   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 20:38   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Tom Lane
• 20:54   Suggestion to simplify installation of external modules Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:27   Re: PQ versions request message James William Pye
• 22:52   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 23:46   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Andrew Dunstan
• 23:57   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Tom Lane

9 September 2005

• 00:08   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Andrew Dunstan
• 00:17   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Joshua D. Drake
• 00:22   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Tom Lane
• 00:25   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Joshua D. Drake
• 00:48   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Joshua D. Drake
• 01:10   Re: Alternative variable length structure ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:32   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1beta timezone question Tom Lane
• 02:55   beta2 time? Bruce Momjian
• 03:07   Re: Alternative variable length structure Tom Lane
• 04:20   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 04:37   unsubscribe Rick Woo
• 05:12   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Dennis Bjorklund
• 05:14   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Rupa Schomaker (lists)
• 05:34   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Tom Lane
• 05:40   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template Tom Lane
• 05:46   Re: SQL/XML extension Qingqing Zhou
• 07:16   Re: initdb profiles Andrew - Supernews
• 07:16   R: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Paolo Magnoli
• 07:25   Re: initdb profiles Dave Page
• 10:25   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Simon Riggs
• 10:34   Case insensitive indexing in posgtres? sandeep satpal
• 10:54   Re: Case insensitive indexing in posgtres? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:03   Re: Alternative variable length structure Manfred Koizar
• 11:55   statement_timeout logging Simon Riggs
• 13:46   Re: R: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: Alternative variable length structure Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [PATCHES] Work-in-progress referential action trigger Stephan Szabo
• 14:50   Re: [PATCHES] Work-in-progress referential action trigger timing Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: [PATCHES] Work-in-progress referential action trigger Stephan Szabo
• 15:47   Re: R: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta AgentM
• 17:07   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 17:32   Re: initdb profiles Steve Atkins
• 18:12   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Bruce Momjian
• 18:38   Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Chuck McDevitt
• 18:58   Re: Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Dave Page
• 19:08   Re: Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Joshua D. Drake
• 19:18   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Andrew Dunstan
• 20:37   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Andrew Dunstan

10 September 2005

• 00:12   Re: initdb profiles Jim C. Nasby
• 00:35   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 05:28   Re: PostgreSQL from source using MinGW Bruce Momjian
• 12:30   Re: initdb profiles Robert Treat
• 14:29   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Dave Page
• 16:10   FAQ/HTML standard? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:55   Re: initdb profiles Tom Lane
• 17:59   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Bruno Wolff III
• 18:11   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Jeff MacDonald
• 18:31   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Andrew Dunstan
• 18:38   Re: initdb profiles Peter Eisentraut
• 20:05   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Build with Visual Studio & MSVC Jean-Marc EBER
• 20:05   Re: Attention PL authors: want to be listed in template table? Dave Cramer
• 20:18   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Tino Wildenhain
• 21:12   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Neil Conway
• 22:01   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Bruno Wolff III
• 22:56   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:12   pg_restore bug on win32 Tony Caduto
• 23:22   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? James William Pye

11 September 2005

• 00:05   Re: pg_restore bug on win32 Tom Lane
• 00:39   Re: pg_restore bug on win32 Tom Lane
• 01:08   Re: pg_restore bug on win32 Tony Caduto
• 02:04   Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop? Tom Lane
• 02:50   Re: pg_restore bug on win32 Andrew Dunstan
• 03:18   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Petr Jelinek
• 03:32   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Bruno Wolff III
• 06:51   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Sandy McArthur
• 08:32   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Jochem van Dieten
• 11:12   random system table corruption ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 11:57   Re: random system table corruption ... Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:47   Benchmarks? Martin Ehmsen
• 14:31   problem for o/p rajinder ruprai
• 15:32   Re: FAQ/HTML standard? Robert Treat
• 15:49   -fPIC Peter Eisentraut
• 16:15   Re: initdb profiles Greg Stark
• 16:24   Re: random system table corruption ... Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: -fPIC Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: random system table corruption ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 17:06   Re: initdb profiles Andrew Dunstan
• 17:11   Re: -fPIC Peter Eisentraut
• 17:22   Re: initdb profiles Jim C. Nasby
• 18:00   Re: random system table corruption ... Alvaro Herrera
• 18:49   Re: -fPIC Kurt Roeckx
• 19:37   Re: random system table corruption ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 20:56   Re: -fPIC Stephen Frost
• 20:57   Re: problem for o/p Michael Fuhr
• 21:51   Spinlocks, yet again: a new test case Tom Lane
• 21:59   Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Kurt Roeckx
• 23:42   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: a new test case Gavin Sherry

12 September 2005

• 00:45   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 00:54   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 01:15   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 01:21   Re: -fPIC Greg Stark
• 02:20   counting disk access from index seek operation -- how to? huaxin zhang
• 02:32   Re: -fPIC Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 03:16   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: a new test case Mark Kirkwood
• 03:17   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 03:20   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Qingqing Zhou
• 03:36   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 03:40   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 03:58   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 04:12   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 05:01   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Mark Kirkwood
• 07:06   Re: -fPIC Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:17   Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Jean-Michel Pouré
• 08:24   Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Jean-Michel Pouré
• 10:04   Re: Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Tino Wildenhain
• 16:11   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: a new test case Josh Berkus
• 16:22   Re: Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
• 17:29   Re: -fPIC Kurt Roeckx
• 18:00   Re: Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Dann Corbit
• 18:37   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 18:48   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 19:12   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 21:16   Re: counting disk access from index seek operation -- how to? Qingqing Zhou
• 21:51   Autoconf Lee, Patricia S.
• 22:49   Re: Autoconf Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane

13 September 2005

• 07:31   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Marko Kreen
• 10:37   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 12:35   Hard drive failure leads to corrupt db Brusser, Michael
• 12:49   Re: Hard drive failure leads to corrupt db Brusser, Michael
• 13:47   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 13:54   Re: Hard drive failure leads to corrupt db Peter Eisentraut
• 14:14   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 14:40   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 14:47   bug #1702: nested composite types in plpgsql Roman Neuhauser
• 15:40   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 16:01   Re: Hard drive failure leads to corrupt db Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:04   Re: Hard drive failure leads to corrupt db Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Josh Berkus
• 16:21   Re: bug #1702: nested composite types in plpgsql Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: Materialized Views in PostgreSQL Josh Berkus
• 16:54   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Douglas McNaught
• 16:57   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Douglas McNaught
• 17:11   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 17:18   postgresql CVS callgraph data from dbt2 Mark Wong
• 17:32   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Douglas McNaught
• 17:35   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Mark Wong
• 17:49   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 18:35   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 19:41   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 20:46   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Marko Kreen
• 21:18   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Min Xu (Hsu)
• 23:48   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost

14 September 2005

• 00:06   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry
• 00:14   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 00:42   About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Pryscila B Guttoski
• 02:17   8.1 system info / admin functions Neil Conway
• 02:43   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 02:55   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Min Xu (Hsu)
• 03:05   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Jonah H. Harris
• 03:12   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Neil Conway
• 03:23   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Min Xu (Hsu)
• 03:24   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Tom Lane
• 03:43   VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev Joshua D. Drake
• 03:59   Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev Joshua D. Drake
• 05:37   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Neil Conway
• 06:33   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Neil Conway
• 06:36   Bug with cursor declaration in plpgsql? (Repost) Michael Paesold
• 07:15   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 07:18   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Dave Page
• 07:30   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 07:41   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 08:02   Re: postgresql CVS callgraph data from dbt2 Michael Paesold
• 08:19   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Andreas Pflug
• 08:25   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:04   Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev Dave Cramer
• 13:39   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Stephen Frost
• 13:48   Re: Bug with cursor declaration in plpgsql? (Repost) Tom Lane
• 14:15   parameterized fetch Merlin Moncure
• 14:49   Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions Andreas Pflug
• 15:42   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Josh Berkus
• 15:52   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Pryscila B Guttoski
• 16:19   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 16:43   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Jonah H. Harris
• 16:58   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 17:45   Constraint Type Coercion issue? Josh Berkus
• 17:54   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Tom Lane
• 18:23   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Tom Lane
• 20:56   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 21:16   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:29   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:54   Re: parameterized fetch Oliver Jowett

15 September 2005

• 00:27   Bug with cursor declaration in PL/pgSQL in CVS tip? Michael Paesold
• 00:31   inverse OR distributive law? Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:03   Re: inverse OR distributive law? Dann Corbit
• 02:13   Per-table freeze limit proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 02:42   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Tom Lane
• 03:04   Re: inverse OR distributive law? Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal Tom Lane
• 04:40   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Jonah H. Harris
• 05:29   Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer Jonah H. Harris
• 07:18   Re: Constraint Type Coercion issue? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:57   Re: random system table corruption ... Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 10:41   Re: bug #1702: nested composite types in plpgsql Roman Neuhauser
• 11:46   Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal Jim Buttafuoco
• 14:24   pgplsql temporary tables Maximiliano Di Rienzo
• 14:57   Re: pgplsql temporary tables Merlin Moncure
• 19:20   Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 19:41   pg_autovacuum settings not saved on dump Alvaro Herrera
• 19:53   Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: pg_autovacuum settings not saved on dump Tom Lane
• 21:05   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Michael Paesold
• 21:49   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: US Census database (Tiger 2004FE) - 4.4G Darcy Buskermolen
• 23:56   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry

16 September 2005

• 00:01   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Simon Riggs
• 00:06   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 00:09   Beta2 Wrap Up ... Marc G. Fournier
• 00:53   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry
• 00:55   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway
• 02:26   Re: pg_autovacuum settings not saved on dump Robert Treat
• 02:31   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 02:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway
• 03:24   Re: pg_autovacuum settings not saved on dump Tom Lane
• 03:48   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gregory Maxwell
• 04:20   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 05:00   Request to clarify on sql_numeric datatype Raghavendra Reddy
• 05:37   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway
• 07:06   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry
• 07:40   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Dave Page
• 07:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Dave Page
• 08:08   New dot releases Devrim Gunduz
• 10:19   8.1 win32 beta? Tony Caduto
• 10:37   Re: inet increment with int Bruce Momjian
• 10:46   when started century? PostgreSQL vs Oracle diff Pavel Stehule
• 10:49   Re: 8.1 win32 beta? Dave Page
• 10:49   Re: 8.1 win32 beta? Petr Jelinek
• 10:54   Time to close hackers-win32? Dave Page
• 11:12   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 11:19   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 11:47   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 11:56   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 12:25   Re: when started century? PostgreSQL vs Oracle diff Adrian Maier
• 13:18   Request to clarify on sql_numeric datatype Raghavendra Reddy
• 13:21   Re: 8.1 win32 beta? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:45   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway
• 13:55   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Dave Page
• 14:15   Re: New dot releases Tom Lane
• 14:29   Re: Request to clarify on sql_numeric datatype Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: inverse OR distributive law? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:55   Re: New dot releases Joshua D. Drake
• 15:15   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 15:19   Re: inet increment with int Patrick Welche
• 15:29   Re: New dot releases Michael Fuhr
• 15:55   Re: US Census database (Tiger 2004FE) - 4.4G Joshua D. Drake
• 16:39   Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Alvaro Herrera
• 16:39   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Josh Berkus
• 16:48   Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: inet increment with int Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta Bruce Momjian
• 17:47   Re: New dot releases Michael Fuhr
• 18:14   Beta2 Bundled ... Marc G. Fournier
• 18:26   Re: when started century? PostgreSQL vs Oracle diff Greg Stark
• 18:36   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Greg Stark
• 19:33   Re: statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Stephen Frost
• 19:51   Re: statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 20:41   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Jonah H. Harris
• 20:54   Re: statement_timeout logging Alvaro Herrera
• 21:06   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:14   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett
• 21:30   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Jonah H. Harris
• 21:51   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Simon Riggs
• 21:59   Re: statement_timeout logging Simon Riggs
• 22:04   Re: [DOCS] statement_timeout logging Simon Riggs

17 September 2005

• 00:48   Re: statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 04:22   BEOS code Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: [DOCS] statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 04:42   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry
• 04:59   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Tom Lane
• 05:42   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Tom Lane
• 05:46   Re: BEOS code Tom Lane
• 11:45   Corrupt catalog Nykolyn, Andrew
• 11:46   Re: Time to close hackers-win32? William ZHANG
• 12:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Magnus Hagander
• 12:48   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32? Magnus Hagander
• 13:41   C trigger problem Patrick Welche
• 14:11   Re: C trigger problem Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Andreas Pflug
• 22:30   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Magnus Hagander
• 22:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway

18 September 2005

• 11:08   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close pgsql-cygwin? Reini Urban
• 16:16   64-bit API for large objects Mark Dilger
• 16:34   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Jim C. Nasby
• 17:07   Re: statement_timeout logging Simon Riggs
• 17:20   Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:32   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Josh Berkus
• 20:01   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:19   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:26   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? John Hansen
• 20:30   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:51   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:42   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Gavin Sherry
• 22:04   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Hannu Krosing
• 22:45   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Tom Lane
• 23:05   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Andrew Dunstan

19 September 2005

• 00:02   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Greg Stark
• 03:23   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Tom Lane
• 03:34   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Tom Lane
• 03:47   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Marc G. Fournier
• 05:38   Start translating Peter Eisentraut
• 06:45   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:14   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Hannu Krosing
• 09:10   FW:How to modify a tuple returned by SPI_execute Mario Weilguni
• 09:12   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Magnus Hagander
• 09:13   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Magnus Hagander
• 09:25   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:56   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Hannu Krosing
• 11:56   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jonah H. Harris
• 13:01   Re: New dot releases Devrim GUNDUZ
• 14:27   DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 14:51   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Neil Conway
• 14:53   Re: New dot releases Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: Start translating Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal Jim C. Nasby
• 15:16   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Magnus Hagander
• 15:25   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Greg Stark
• 15:34   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Greg Stark
• 15:56   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Marc G. Fournier
• 16:21   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Greg Stark
• 16:58   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 17:13   postmaster core dump Patrick Welche
• 17:21   Re: statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 17:50   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Bruce Momjian
• 18:56   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Dave Page
• 19:05   Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... Neil Conway
• 19:07   Re: postmaster core dump Patrick Welche
• 19:50   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Tom Lane
• 19:59   Re: postmaster core dump Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: postmaster core dump Patrick Welche
• 21:00   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Greg Stark
• 23:05   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   logging blemishes Andrew Dunstan

20 September 2005

• 00:51   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Mark Dilger
• 01:17   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32? Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
• 02:41   Re: logging blemishes Bruce Momjian
• 05:10   Re: New dot releases Michael Fuhr
• 09:30   beta2 make check failed on Win32 William ZHANG
• 11:22   Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:56   Re: logging blemishes Andrew Dunstan
• 12:15   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jonah H. Harris
• 13:12   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Alexander Kirpa
• 13:12   Re: Start translating Guillaume LELARGE
• 17:17   Gerbil build farm failure Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Jim C. Nasby
• 19:04   Re: pg_autovacuum settings not saved on dump Jim C. Nasby
• 19:15   Re: New dot releases Jim C. Nasby
• 19:26   passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Oleg Bartunov
• 19:40   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Jim C. Nasby
• 19:50   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Andrew Dunstan
• 20:11   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:14   Re: SHM_LOCK under Linux ... do we use this? Jan Wieck
• 21:06   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
• 22:05   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Tom Lane
• 22:08   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Jim C. Nasby
• 22:45   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Jim C. Nasby

21 September 2005

• 01:31   Re: logging blemishes Andrew Dunstan
• 05:02   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Oleg Bartunov
• 05:10   pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate Michael Fuhr
• 05:47   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Hannu Krosing
• 06:31   Re: beta2 make check failed on Win32 Qingqing Zhou
• 09:12   Re: Start translating Laszlo Hornyak
• 12:13   Re: beta2 make check failed on Win32 William ZHANG
• 13:30   feature proposal ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 13:31   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:46   Re: feature proposal ... Rod Taylor
• 14:09   Re: feature proposal ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 14:10   R: feature proposal ... Paolo Magnoli
• 14:15   Re: R: feature proposal ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 15:38   Re: R: feature proposal ... Tom Lane
• 15:49   Where is pgxs? Thomas Hallgren
• 16:08   Re: feature proposal ... Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: Where is pgxs? Dave Page
• 16:29   Re: logging blemishes Bruce Momjian
• 16:39   Re: R: feature proposal ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 16:39   Re: R: feature proposal ... Joshua D. Drake
• 16:46   Re: statement_timeout logging Simon Riggs
• 16:50   Re: Where is pgxs? Magnus Hagander
• 16:56   Re: R: feature proposal ... Cristian Prieto
• 16:58   Re: pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate Robert Treat
• 17:02   postgresql clustering Rafik Salama
• 17:10   Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 17:11   Re: postgresql clustering David Fetter
• 17:44   Re: postgresql clustering Aly Dharshi
• 17:48   Re: postgresql clustering Rafik Salama
• 18:04   Re: R: feature proposal ... Chris Browne
• 18:22   Re: postgresql clustering Jonah H. Harris
• 19:06   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:10   Re: statement_timeout logging Bruce Momjian
• 19:43   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: logging blemishes Andrew Dunstan
• 19:58   Re: pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: beta2 make check failed on Win32 Tom Lane
• 21:41   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 21:47   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 22:11   What has happened to pgxs? Thomas Hallgren
• 22:23   Re: feature proposal ... Trent Shipley
• 22:32   Re: feature proposal ... Rod Taylor
• 23:56   Re: feature proposal ... Andrew Dunstan

22 September 2005

• 00:34   Re: feature proposal ... Rod Taylor
• 01:02   Re: feature proposal ... Andrew Dunstan
• 01:10   2 forks for md5? Andrew Dunstan
• 03:09   Re: feature proposal ... Tom Lane
• 03:10   Re: 2 forks for md5? Andrew Dunstan
• 03:11   Re: logging blemishes Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Re: 2 forks for md5? Tom Lane
• 03:30   Re: 2 forks for md5? Tom Lane
• 05:41   Re: feature proposal ... Hannu Krosing
• 05:52   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Gavin Sherry
• 06:56   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs David Fetter
• 06:56   Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour Gavin Sherry
• 07:16   Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs Michael Glaesemann
• 09:14   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 10:01   Re: Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour Michael Paesold
• 10:35   Re: R: feature proposal ... Karel Zak
• 12:15   Re: Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour Tom Lane
• 12:59   Re: Parser bug results in ambiguous errors/behaviour Gavin Sherry
• 13:15   Re: feature proposal ... Greg Stark
• 14:36   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Alvaro Herrera
• 14:43   Re: feature proposal ... Tom Lane
• 15:19   Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Jonah H. Harris
• 15:30   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Alvaro Herrera
• 15:39   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: logging blemishes Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Alvaro Herrera
• 15:55   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Jonah H. Harris
• 16:05   Re: feature proposal ... Bruce Momjian
• 16:21   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Simon Riggs
• 16:33   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Bruce Momjian
• 16:45   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Thomas Hallgren
• 17:15   Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Josh Berkus
• 18:32   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Anthony Molinaro
• 18:39   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Josh Berkus
• 18:45   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Anthony Molinaro
• 19:01   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Josh Berkus
• 19:10   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Anthony Molinaro
• 19:26   Re: R: feature proposal ... Jim C. Nasby
• 19:38   Re: R: feature proposal ... Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 19:38   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Jim C. Nasby
• 19:47   Re: R: feature proposal ... AgentM
• 19:55   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Joshua D. Drake
• 20:02   Re: 2 forks for md5? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:09   Re: R: feature proposal ... Hannu Krosing
• 20:18   Re: R: feature proposal ... Andrew Dunstan
• 20:30   Re: R: feature proposal ... Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: R: feature proposal ... Jim Nasby
• 20:39   Re: R: feature proposal ... Andrew Dunstan
• 20:57   PCTFree Results Josh Berkus
• 21:38   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Jonah H. Harris
• 21:53   Re: R: feature proposal ... Bruce Momjian
• 22:06   Re: PCTFree Results Jonah H. Harris
• 22:11   Re: PCTFree Results Josh Berkus
• 22:12   pgxs and pginstaller Bruce Momjian
• 22:18   Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer... Alvaro Herrera
• 22:20   Re: PCTFree Results Jonah H. Harris
• 22:36   Re: 2 forks for md5? Bruce Momjian
• 22:43   Re: 2 forks for md5? Tom Lane
• 22:56   Re: 2 forks for md5? Andrew Dunstan
• 23:14   Re: Proposed patch to clean up signed-ness warnings Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:18   Re: 2 forks for md5? Bruce Momjian
• 23:21   Re: 2 forks for md5? Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   Re: R: feature proposal ... Trent Shipley
• 23:46   Re: Proposed patch to clean up signed-ness warnings Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   Re: passing parameters to CREATE INDEX Bruce Momjian
• 23:55   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Bruce Momjian

23 September 2005

• 00:00   Re: 2 forks for md5? Tom Lane
• 00:03   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Tom Lane
• 00:33   Re: Proposed patch to clean up signed-ness warnings Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:06   Re: PCTFree Results Tom Lane
• 02:28   Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   Re: PCTFree Results Josh Berkus
• 02:59   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1883: Renaming a schema leaves inconsistent sequence Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: pg_config/share_dir Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: [ADMIN] How to determine date / time of last postmaster Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   SQL/XML public functions documentation for PostgreSQL 8.2 Pavel Stehule
• 03:42   Re: SQL/XML public functions documentation for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 05:16   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Jim C. Nasby
• 05:18   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Tom Lane
• 05:25   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Jim C. Nasby
• 05:49   Re: postgresql clustering Daniel Duvall
• 05:52   pg_autovacuum startup from /etc/rc fails after system crash Jonathan Beit-Aharon
• 06:25   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Thomas Hallgren
• 06:33   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Michael Paesold
• 06:54   Re: PCTFree Results Jim C. Nasby
• 07:00   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Thomas Hallgren
• 07:13   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Dave Page
• 09:37   Releasing memory during External sorting? Simon Riggs
• 09:49   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Thomas Hallgren
• 09:51   Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 09:53   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Dave Page
• 10:12   Hack credit card ( New Fraud ) !! John K
• 10:16   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Thomas Hallgren
• 10:29   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Dave Page
• 10:29   R: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Paolo Magnoli
• 10:56   Re: R: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 11:19   stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 11:43   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Michael Paesold
• 13:57   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Thomas Hallgren
• 14:29   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 14:32   Re: pgxs and pginstaller Dave Page
• 14:36   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Dave Page
• 14:47   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: What has happened to pgxs? Dave Page
• 15:07   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Simon Riggs
• 15:31   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: R: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 Bricklen Anderson
• 16:40   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 16:46   PgAdmin3 1.2.2 Install on Win32 Disrupts Pg Service Lee, Patricia S.
• 17:17   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: 2 forks for md5? Bruce Momjian
• 17:53   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation Bruce Momjian
• 17:58   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation Tom Lane
• 18:07   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 18:16   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:32   Re: Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility Bruce Momjian
• 20:45   Re: pg_dump fails to set index ownership Bruce Momjian
• 20:47   Re: pg_dump fails to set index ownership Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Jonathan Beit-Aharon
• 21:03   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Ron Peacetree
• 21:04   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Ron Peacetree
• 21:07   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Ron Peacetree
• 21:11   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Mark Lewis
• 21:20   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Dann Corbit
• 21:31   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: ALTER ROLES - questions Bruce Momjian
• 21:38   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Dann Corbit
• 21:39   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Bruce Momjian
• 21:40   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 21:44   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs. Bruce Momjian
• 21:46   Re: pg_dump fails to set index ownership Michael Fuhr
• 22:00   Re: ALTER ROLES - questions Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: ALTER ROLES - questions Bruce Momjian
• 22:33   Re: 64-bit API for large objects David Fetter
• 23:30   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Oliver Jowett
• 23:36   Re: PgAdmin3 1.2.2 Install on Win32 Disrupts Pg Service Dave Page

24 September 2005

• 03:14   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 05:24   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Meir Maor
• 05:36   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 06:33   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Dann Corbit
• 07:29   questionable item in HISTORY Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:34   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 10:09   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:27   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 11:13   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:38   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 13:54   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:21   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 15:56   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 16:03   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Ron Peacetree
• 16:03   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 16:13   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Alvaro Herrera
• 17:13   Re: Proposed patch to clean up signed-ness warnings Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: 2 forks for md5? Andrew Dunstan
• 19:47   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 20:00   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jeremy Drake
• 21:03   gcc4's uninitialized-variable warnings Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 21:45   \x output blowing up Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:01   Re: Start translating Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: \x output blowing up Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:47   Re: Start translating Tom Lane
• 22:56   Re: questionable item in HISTORY Bruce Momjian
• 23:04   Discarding relations from FSM Jim C. Nasby
• 23:07   Re: 2 forks for md5? Bruce Momjian
• 23:09   Re: gcc4's uninitialized-variable warnings Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: Discarding relations from FSM Bruce Momjian
• 23:18   Re: \x output blowing up Bruce Momjian
• 23:21   Re: Discarding relations from FSM Tom Lane
• 23:59   \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby

25 September 2005

• 00:17   Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 00:20   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Rod Taylor
• 00:32   Re: Discarding relations from FSM Jim C. Nasby
• 00:38   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 01:20   Re: Discarding relations from FSM Bruce Momjian
• 03:28   Re: Vacuum questions... Joshua D. Drake
• 04:29   Re: Vacuum questions... Alvaro Herrera
• 07:17   Re: Vacuum questions... Hannu Krosing
• 07:17   Re: Discarding relations from FSM Hannu Krosing
• 07:17   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Hannu Krosing
• 09:18   Re: \x output blowing up Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:14   Re: stack depth limit exceeded problem. Thomas Hallgren
• 16:04   Re: Vacuum questions... Joshua D. Drake
• 16:14   Re: Vacuum questions... Tom Lane
• 17:26   roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 17:45   Re: Releasing memory during External sorting? Simon Riggs
• 17:45   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Simon Riggs
• 20:45   Questions about proper newline handling in psql output Martijn van Oosterhout
• 23:27   Re: statement logging / extended query protocol issues Oliver Jowett

26 September 2005

• 07:39   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Dennis Bjorklund
• 07:58   "expected authentication request from server, but received..." Michał Jęczalik
• 08:16   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but received..." Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:27   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but Michal Jeczalik
• 08:41   Inheritance + references fixup Ilia Kantor
• 08:50   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but Michael Paesold
• 12:58   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Dave Cramer
• 13:15   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but received..." Tom Lane
• 13:59   Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Андрей Репко
• 14:08   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but Alvaro Herrera
• 14:16   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Dennis Bjorklund
• 14:28   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Dennis Bjorklund
• 14:44   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Tom Lane
• 14:47   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Dave Page
• 15:01   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Greg Stark
• 15:08   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Dave Page
• 15:16   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Jochem van Dieten
• 15:32   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but Michal Jeczalik
• 15:41   Re: Vacuum questions... Gaetano Mendola
• 15:47   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 16:14   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Gaetano Mendola
• 16:16   Re: Vacuum questions... Alvaro Herrera
• 16:22   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Dennis Bjorklund
• 16:23   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Andreas Pflug
• 16:46   Re: "expected authentication request from server, but Michal Jeczalik
• 16:46   vacuum analyze hanging Kevin Grittner
• 16:49   Re: openbsd, plpython, missing threading symbols Bruce Momjian
• 16:51   Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   On Logging David Fetter
• 17:00   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Tom Lane
• 17:00   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Bruce Momjian
• 17:06   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Joshua D. Drake
• 17:13   Re: On Logging Christopher Petrilli
• 17:13   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? Dann Corbit
• 17:22   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Andreas Pflug
• 17:23   Re: On Logging Andrew Dunstan
• 17:24   Re: On Logging Bruce Momjian
• 17:29   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Joshua D. Drake
• 17:30   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   Re: On Logging Andreas Pflug
• 17:36   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 18:18   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 18:20   Re: Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 18:35   Re: On Logging Andreas Pflug
• 18:44   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 18:45   Re: pg_autovacuum startup from /etc/rc fails after system crash Jim C. Nasby
• 18:48   Re: On Logging Ron Mayer
• 19:18   Re: On Logging Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: pg_config/share_dir Tom Lane
• 19:47   Re: pg_config/share_dir Jim C. Nasby
• 19:47   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: On Logging David Fetter
• 19:51   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Andrew Dunstan
• 20:38   Re-run query on automatic reconnect Jim C. Nasby
• 20:46   [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 20:55   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Joe Conway
• 20:57   Re: Re-run query on automatic reconnect Michael Fuhr
• 20:57   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Magnus Hagander
• 21:06   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Andrew Dunstan
• 21:06   Re: Re-run query on automatic reconnect Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Dann Corbit
• 21:22   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Jim C. Nasby
• 21:27   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jonah H. Harris
• 21:32   Re: 64-bit API for large objects Tom Lane
• 21:57   State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: State of support for back PG branches Devrim GUNDUZ
• 22:27   Database file compatability Jim C. Nasby
• 22:34   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 22:49   Re: Database file compatability Qingqing Zhou
• 22:50   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Michael Fuhr
• 23:06   Re: Database file compatability Tom Lane
• 23:16   Re: State of support for back PG branches Andrew Dunstan

27 September 2005

• 00:01   Re: State of support for back PG branches Marc G. Fournier
• 00:12   Re: Questions about proper newline handling in psql output Greg Sabino Mullane
• 00:12   Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Tom Lane
• 00:32   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Tom Lane
• 00:33   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 00:41   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 01:18   Re: Vacuum questions... Gaetano Mendola
• 01:27   Re: State of support for back PG branches Andrew Dunstan
• 01:42   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Tom Lane
• 01:49   Re: Database file compatability Joshua D. Drake
• 02:08   Re: State of support for back PG branches Marc G. Fournier
• 02:26   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: State of support for back PG branches Joshua D. Drake
• 03:03   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 03:26   Re: State of support for back PG branches David Fetter
• 03:26   Re: State of support for back PG branches Joshua D. Drake
• 03:55   Re: State of support for back PG branches Josh Berkus
• 04:00   Re: State of support for back PG branches Steve Atkins
• 04:07   Re: State of support for back PG branches Joshua D. Drake
• 04:19   Re: State of support for back PG branches Tom Lane
• 04:29   unchecked malloc Qingqing Zhou
• 04:54   Re: State of support for back PG branches Joshua D. Drake
• 05:03   Re: unchecked malloc Tom Lane
• 05:24   Re: unchecked malloc Qingqing Zhou
• 05:40   Re: unchecked malloc Tom Lane
• 06:07   Re: State of support for back PG branches Michael Paesold
• 06:13   Re: State of support for back PG branches Steve Atkins
• 07:38   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page
• 07:57   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Magnus Hagander
• 08:18   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page
• 08:19   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Magnus Hagander
• 08:21   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page
• 10:16   Strange, very strange Andrey Repko
• 10:25   prepared queries in plperl Dmitry Karasik
• 12:04   Re: prepared queries in plperl Andrew Dunstan
• 12:09   Re: unchecked malloc Sibtay Abbas
• 12:30   Re: Database file compatability Jeffrey W. Baker
• 12:30   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 12:30   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Abhijit Menon-Sen
• 12:30   PostgreSQL overall design Gnanavel S
• 12:34   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 12:49   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jonah H. Harris
• 13:00   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Jonah H. Harris
• 13:02   Re: Questions about proper newline handling in psql output Peter Eisentraut
• 13:04   Re: State of support for back PG branches Chris Browne
• 13:08   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Andrew Dunstan
• 13:32   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Peter Eisentraut
• 13:58   Re: Questions about proper newline handling in psql output Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:08   Re: Questions about proper newline handling in psql output Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:12   Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL overall design Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: prepared queries in plperl Dmitry Karasik
• 14:28   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Tom Lane
• 15:09   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Magnus Hagander
• 15:15   Re: Vacuum questions... Gaetano Mendola
• 15:18   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: Database file compatability Jim C. Nasby
• 16:16   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 16:16   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Peter Eisentraut
• 16:27   Re: State of support for back PG branches Josh Berkus
• 16:36   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1883: Renaming a schema leaves inconsistent Bruce Momjian
• 16:41   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 17:27   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 17:51   Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? Tom Lane
• 17:57   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Tom Lane
• 18:05   effective SELECT from child tables Ilia Kantor
• 18:30   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1883: Renaming a schema leaves inconsistent Tom Lane
• 18:30   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Josh Berkus
• 18:38   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: Vacuum questions... Jan Wieck
• 19:07   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:21   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 19:35   Re: [BUGS] BUG #1883: Renaming a schema leaves inconsistent Bruce Momjian
• 22:33   Re: Gerbil build farm failure Jim C. Nasby
• 22:36   Re: Re-run query on automatic reconnect Jim C. Nasby
• 22:46   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 22:55   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Tom Lane
• 22:57   Re: Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 23:12   Re: Vacuum questions... Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 23:50   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 23:50   Re: State of support for back PG branches Marc G. Fournier

28 September 2005

• 00:16   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 00:22   Re: Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 01:58   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 03:10   Re: Database file compatability Qingqing Zhou
• 03:27   Re: Database file compatability Tom Lane
• 04:04   Re: State of support for back PG branches Chris Browne
• 05:10   enhanced pgbench Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:37   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Peter Eisentraut
• 06:25   Re: Database file compatability Qingqing Zhou
• 07:33   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Dave Page
• 08:51   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Ilia Kantor
• 08:51   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Ilia Kantor
• 09:05   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page
• 12:36   execution of prepared statements leaks memory Dmitry Karasik
• 12:43   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page
• 13:17   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Kevin Grittner
• 13:18   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Jonathan Beit-Aharon
• 13:18   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Gnanavel S
• 13:19   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Gnanavel S
• 13:22   Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction Jonathan Beit-Aharon
• 13:22   Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL overall design Gnanavel S
• 13:22   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:50   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Alvaro Herrera
• 13:58   Re: effective SELECT from child tables mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 14:00   Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: enhanced pgbench Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: Database file compatability Tom Lane
• 15:25   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 15:27   Re: Database file compatability William ZHANG
• 15:30   Re: enhanced pgbench Tatsuo Ishii
• 15:35   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 15:37   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: enhanced pgbench Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: Database file compatability Qingqing Zhou
• 16:10   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 16:11   Re: unchecked malloc Tom Lane
• 16:42   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Michael Paesold
• 16:58   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 17:25   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 18:26   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Simon Riggs
• 18:26   Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 18:37   Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability Jonah H. Harris
• 18:40   Re: Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 19:01   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Tom Lane
• 19:09   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Ilia Kantor
• 19:10   Found small issue with OUT params Tony Caduto
• 19:47   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tom Lane
• 19:51   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Alvaro Herrera
• 20:24   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:41   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier
• 21:50   Re: Vacuum questions... Hannu Krosing
• 22:07   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Neil Conway
• 22:07   Re: execution of prepared statements leaks memory Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tony Caduto
• 22:59   Re: enhanced pgbench Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:37   Re: postgresql clustering Gaetano Mendola

29 September 2005

• 00:38   Re: postgresql clustering Joshua D. Drake
• 01:45   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tom Lane
• 02:04   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 02:08   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Jonah H. Harris
• 02:21   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Bruce Momjian
• 02:22   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 02:23   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 02:24   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Alvaro Herrera
• 02:31   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 02:33   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Tom Lane
• 02:37   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 02:41   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Open items list Bruce Momjian
• 04:25   pg_total_relation_size() could not open relation with OID X Michael Fuhr
• 04:27   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 06:17   Re: Server process exited with unexpected status 128. Thomas Hallgren
• 06:36   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Peter Eisentraut
• 06:40   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Peter Eisentraut
• 06:50   Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 07:08   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 07:48   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 07:58   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:11   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:21   Constraint exclusion, some questions 
• 09:57   Release build scripts Peter Eisentraut
• 11:12   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
• 12:46   Re: Constraint exclusion, some questions Hannu Krosing
• 12:58   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 12:58   Re: postgresql clustering Daniel Duvall
• 12:58   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:03   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:03   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:07   Query in SQL statement R, Rajesh (STSD)
• 13:31   Re: Query in SQL statement Obe, Regina DND\\MIS
• 13:34   Re: Query in SQL statement Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:35   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 13:40   Re: postgresql clustering Tino Wildenhain
• 14:19   Re: pg_total_relation_size() could not open relation with OID X Alvaro Herrera
• 14:26   Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: postgresql clustering Jonah H. Harris
• 15:05   Re: PCTFree Results Jonah H. Harris
• 15:13   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Peter Eisentraut
• 15:17   Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tony Caduto
• 15:24   Re: postgresql clustering Gaetano Mendola
• 15:27   pgbench: undefined reference to strndup() Michael Fuhr
• 15:33   Re: postgresql clustering Tino Wildenhain
• 15:34   Re: postgresql clustering Luke Lonergan
• 16:23   Re: pgbench: undefined reference to strndup() Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Josh Berkus
• 16:54   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 17:07   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Luke Lonergan
• 17:18   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? David Fetter
• 17:44   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 17:59   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 18:16   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jeffrey W. Baker
• 18:24   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 18:32   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Dann Corbit
• 20:05   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 20:28   Re: Open items list Bruce Momjian
• 21:42   Re: pgbench: undefined reference to strndup() Tatsuo Ishii
• 21:43   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 22:02   Re: pg_total_relation_size() could not open relation with OID X Alvaro Herrera
• 22:06   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Mike Rylander
• 22:18   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Alvaro Herrera
• 23:19   Re: GSSAPI or Kerberos authentication problems Kris Jurka

30 September 2005

• 04:22   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Luke Lonergan
• 05:44   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 05:51   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 06:09   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 06:21   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 06:29   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 06:31   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 09:08   FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to Contrib failure Dave Page
• 12:07   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Alvaro Herrera
• 13:03   Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? Fabien COELHO
• 13:03   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:08   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:09   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 13:10   Re: postgresql clustering Daniel Duvall
• 13:11   Re: postgresql clustering Daniel Duvall
• 13:13   Fwd: Re: postgresql clustering Trent Shipley
• 13:13   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? PFC
• 13:42   Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? Alvaro Herrera
• 13:46   Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Magnus Hagander
• 15:20   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tony Caduto
• 15:50   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:12   Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP Thomas Hallgren
• 17:23   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 17:41   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Tony Caduto
• 17:44   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Dann Corbit
• 17:51   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Joshua D. Drake
• 18:26   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Robert Treat
• 20:37   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Josh Berkus
• 20:39   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Luke Lonergan
• 20:49   Re: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to Contrib failure Alvaro Herrera
• 21:04   Re: postgresql clustering Luke Lonergan
• 21:31   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Dann Corbit
• 21:40   Re: postgresql clustering Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 22:08   Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow Jim C. Nasby
• 22:13   Bug 1473, pthread python on FreeBSD Jim C. Nasby
• 22:18   Re: Vacuum questions... Jim C. Nasby
• 22:27   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Jim C. Nasby
• 22:31   Re: roundoff problem in time datatype Jim C. Nasby
• 22:43   Re: FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed Andrew Dunstan
• 22:47   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Jim C. Nasby
• 22:54   Re: On Logging Jim C. Nasby
• 22:56   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Neil Conway
• 22:58   Re: Open items list for 8.1 Bruce Momjian
• 23:01   Re: State of support for back PG branches Jim C. Nasby
• 23:02   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? PFC
• 23:10   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Jignesh K. Shah
• 23:10   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 23:11   Request for a "force interactive mode" flag (-I) for psql Bill Bartlett
• 23:14   Re: State of support for back PG branches Jim C. Nasby
• 23:15   Re: Database file compatability Jim C. Nasby
• 23:19   Re: PostgreSQL overall design Jim C. Nasby
• 23:26   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Jim C. Nasby
• 23:30   Re: effective SELECT from child tables Jim C. Nasby
• 23:40   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Ron Peacetree
• 23:42   Re: Found small issue with OUT params Jim C. Nasby
• 23:48   Re: Query in SQL statement Jim C. Nasby
• 23:52   Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? Dann Corbit