Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9DBD@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Call for 7.5 feature completion  (mike g <mike@thegodshalls.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net]
> Sent: 01 September 2005 03:31
> To: William ZHANG
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for 7.5 feature completion
>
>
> We currently have nmake files for the client libraries,

And even those are a royal pain to maintain, never mind an entire set.

Besides, I'm sure what William really wants is not nmake files, but VC++
Project files - but then which version do we keep? It's not like we
could say that everyone should be using VS2005, so all commits would
have to be VC++ 6.0 or earlier compatible, otherwise someone is bound to
complain.

I agree with Andrew though - maintaining VC++ project files or nmake
files is just not practical - especially given that most of our
developers are not Windows users.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-allocated free space for row
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types