Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3?
Date
Msg-id 3253.1125595028@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION - Should be Documented as 3?  (Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com> writes:
> doc/src/sgml/storage.sgml says:

There's a number of things not updated yet in that file :-(
I believe it hasn't heard of pg_twophase either.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: upgrade path / versioning roles