Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date
Msg-id 43330D1E.7000606@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
List pgsql-hackers
> 
> On reflection, the only changes I suggest are:
> 
> 1) the phrase "This allows for a type of table partitioning" have the
> word "basic" inserted within it to become: "This allows for a basic type
> of table partitioning"

How about just: Initial support for table partitioning. Yes it is 
non-committal but that is a good thing since nobody 100% agrees anyway.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: AgentM
Date:
Subject: Re: R: feature proposal ...
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: 2 forks for md5?