Re: State of support for back PG branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date
Msg-id 4338D096.5050500@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of support for back PG branches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: State of support for back PG branches
List pgsql-hackers
>[ raised eyebrow... ]  Has bizgres obtained a crystal ball from
>somewhere?  There is *no* way anyone could provide you anything that
>has any legitimate claim on the name "PG 8.2" three months from now.
>  
>

I **think** what he meant was that depending on what Bizgres has done in 
the next three
months they may not run 8.1 but run Bizgres instead.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>            regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>  
>


-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: unchecked malloc
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: unchecked malloc