Re: State of support for back PG branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date
Msg-id 7254.1127794776@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of support for back PG branches  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Responses Re: State of support for back PG branches
List pgsql-hackers
Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> writes:
> We'll be skipping 8.0 completely and the next step will probably be to
> 8.1.something (or possibly 8.2.something, depending on how bizgres
> looks in 3 months time).

[ raised eyebrow... ]  Has bizgres obtained a crystal ball from
somewhere?  There is *no* way anyone could provide you anything that
has any legitimate claim on the name "PG 8.2" three months from now.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Next
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: unchecked malloc