On 9/24/2005 8:17 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Would it be difficult to vacuum as part of a dump? The reasoning behind
> this is that you have to read the table to do the dump anyway,
I think aside from what's been said so far, it would be rather difficult
anyway. pg_dump relies on MVCC and requires to run in one transaction to
see a consistent snapshot while vacuum jiggles around with transactions
in some rather non-standard way.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
