Re: What has happened to pgxs? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Hallgren
Subject Re: What has happened to pgxs?
Date
Msg-id thhal-0PHgOBLtc8bQq6lvrC5i/+XRjeVvLIf@mailblocks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What has happened to pgxs?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: What has happened to pgxs?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>I tried to compile PL/Java against PostgreSQL 8.1beta2. I use pgxs and 
>>until now that has been just fine. Now pgxs suggests that the include 
>>files reside under /usr/local/pgsql. They don't of course. Not on my 
>>windows box anyway :-)
>>
>>I think it stems from the src/Makefile.global. On line 59 it reads:
>>
>>prefix := /usr/local/pgsql
>>
>>I guess I'm missing something. Can someone explain to me what I need to 
>>change?
>>    
>>
>
>Take a look at Makefile.global.in.  That value is defined by the
>--prefix flag when you run configure.  The default is /usr/local/pgsql,
>and I am guessing you need to change that default on Win32.
>
>  
>
I'm using a pre-compiled installation of PostgreSQL. All I want to do is 
use pgxs to be able to compile PL/Java.

There is other stuff that seems strange to me. Why do you append 
'postgresql' to the include directories further down in the file? I had 
to remove that in order to compile.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: What has happened to pgxs?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages?