Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Date
Msg-id 20050912035817.GI6026@ns.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> > Thanks.  If you've got the time, could you try the two patches
> > separately and see what you get?
>
> Sure.
[...]

Just to be clear- this was from a completely default 'make install'
using the Debian configure options from 8.0.3 (which aren't that
particularly interesting really- nls, integer-datetimes, debug,
disable-rpath, tcl, perl, python, pam, krb5, openssl, gnu-ld,
enable-thread-safety).  If it'd be useful for the test I can adjust
whichever parameters are appropriate (work_mem, cache_size, etc).

There's absolutely nothing else going on except for these test, a few
shells, top, etc, on the box.
Enjoy,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches