Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Date
Msg-id 12223.1126494984@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> em64t, 2 proc + 2 HT, 3.4ghz, 4G, 2.6.12:

> N, runtime:    1 31s    2 47s    4 86s    8 159s

> N, runtime:    1 32s    2 53s    4 90s    8 169s

Er, which (or both) of the two patches did you apply here?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: a new test case