Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date
Msg-id 20195.1127331551@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Table Partitioning is in 8.1  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Is it possible that the Release Notes do not fully explain the
> Constraint Exclusion feature? Or is it the consensus that it works but
> not quite well enough to make a song and dance about yet?

I hardly think that the existing constraint-exclusion code is enough for
us to claim we "support table partitioning".  There's too much grunt
work that the DBA still has to do to set up a partitioning arrangement.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: statement_timeout logging
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: logging blemishes