On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:58:28PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 03:51:15PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > One possible solution is to create a phantom cid which represents a
> > cmin/cmax pair and is stored in local memory.
>
> If we're going to look at doing that I think it would also be good to
> consider including xmin and xmax as well.
If you do that, you'll never be able to delete or update the tuple.
> This might require persisting to disk, but for transactions that touch
> a number of tuples it could potentially be a big win (imagine being
> able to shrink all 4 fields down to a single int; a 45% space
> reduction).
Yeah, I've heard about compression algorithms that managed to fit
megabytes of data in 8 bytes and even less. They were very cool. No
one managed to write decompression algorithms however. Imagine a whole
data warehouse could be stored in a single disk block!! I imagine the
development of decompressors was boycotted by SAN vendors and the like.
--
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"Si un desconocido se acerca y te regala un CD de Ubuntu ... Eso es ... Eau de
Tux"
