On 6-Sep-05, at 11:37 AM, Mark Wong wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:50:25 -0400
> Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On 2-Sep-05, at 3:38 PM, Mark Wong wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Oops, EJB's are distasteful? My experience in this area is quite
>>> lacking.
>>>
>> Well, I said "personally" distasteful.
>>
>>> Not that I necessarily want to be 100% strict but the spec
>>> says this needs to conform to WS-I BP 1.0 specification, which I
>>> understand is basically using the SOAP transport? I just thought it
>>> would be nice to have something that could be plugged into any
>>> application server (Geronimo, JBoss, etc.) with minimal
>>> configuration
>>> changes and that was where I started. I don't mind doing away with
>>> the
>>> EJB altogether. What do you suggest?
>>>
>>
>> I use hibernate, which would allow this to be used without an
>> application server.
>> However strictly speaking, many people are going to want to see EJB's
>> as this is
>> what the appserver types like to use.
>>
>>>
>>> To give you a little better idea of where I'm at, I have most of 7
>>> of 9
>>> interactions implemented, the remaining two I haven't started. The
>>> driver needs to be expanded to simulate multiple users. I haven't
>>> started any of the post processing or data collection scripts yet
>>> and
>>> some of that can be used from our other kits. My Java programming
>>> style
>>> should probably be reviewed too. ;)
>>>
>>
>> I had a very (very) quick look at your code, one suggestion would be
>> log4j, (or other configurable logging API ) for your debugging
>> statements.
>>
>
> Ok, I'll have to learn how to do that. :)
Ok, I'll make some changes to your code and send you a diff
>
>
>> If I have some time, I'll look at it some more, I've come to like
>> using the spring framework. This allows something referred to as IOC
>> (Inversion of Control) Basically, the problem is how to stub test
>> code in when we have static factory objects, the solution is to build
>> the application using a container which specifies the concrete
>> classes which are instantiated. This would in theory allow us to have
>> tow versions. One which uses hibernate, and the other which uses
>> EJB's. So one thing to think about is to code in interfaces more, and
>> instantiate concrete classes which implement the interface.
>>
>
> That sounds like a very good idea. I'll probably need some coaching
> though...
Yeah, I'll try to find some time to do this as well. At least part of
it.I've given some thought
as to how to code this in hibernate, it shouldn't be too hard.
>
> Mark
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
