Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > The thing is that these opclasses you're describing are closely related. It
> > ought to be possible to use a single index to produce results in any of the
> > four orders you describe.
>
> Wrong --- only two of them. You can't magically swap nulls from one end
> of the index to the other (and Hannu's flight of fantasy about double
> indexscans is just a flight of fantasy; it would be solving the problem
> at entirely the wrong place).
I think that was my flight of fantasy. I didn't say it was pretty but it would
solve the problem. Whereas having a separate opclass would mean someone would
need a second index to satisfy the ordering which seems silly.
--
greg
