Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc
Date
Msg-id 20050901211418.GG28062@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Using multi-locale support in glibc
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:46:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > 1. Is something supported by glibc usable for us (re portability to
> > non-glibc platforms)?
>
> Nope.  Sorry.

Do we have some platforms that don't have any multi-language support? I
mean, we don't have a complete thread library but a wrapper around the
ones used on the platform. Couldn't we make a similar wrapper that used
glibc if it was available, windows native if it's available, etc...

That way we conform to the platform rather than a version of the
unicode collating set that postgresql happens to ship with it.

For example, Windows doesn't use standard Unicode sorting rules, do we
care if people come complaining that postgresql sorts different from
their app?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: rename constraint behavior for duplicate names?