Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.63.0509291509480.23120@briare.cri.ensmp.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Tom,

> While testing the recent pgxs patch, I noticed that you can build and
> install contrib with PGXS:
> ...
> It seems that it ought to work to run installcheck too:
>     gmake USE_PGXS=1 installcheck
> but this does not quite work because the pg_regress script isn't
> included in the installation tree.  (If you copy it to where it'd
> need to be, installcheck works.)
>
> Is it worth including pg_regress in the installation to make this
> work?  Seems like it might be handy for external modules to be able
> to run self-tests.

Indeed, I noticed this when I did pgxs;-) It is on my todo list for 
postgresql, but I haven't had time much time this year to contribute 
anything.

The reason it was not included at first is that it seemed to me that 
selftests require a temporary installation which make sense easilly when 
building from sources, but I was not sure about what would be really 
needed for the feature out of the compilation tree (special conf files, 
diff/comparison commands...). I was planning to investigate the details, 
but if the pg_regress command is enough, that was a little bit stupid of 
me not to do it directly. ISTM that the pg_regress command is not compiled 
by default, only under "make test", so it should be added to the default 
compilation?

-- 
Fabien.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Socket problem using beta2 on Windows-XP
Next
From: Ron Peacetree
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?