Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
Date
Msg-id 20050922193737.GS7630@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:11:50AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 15:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > Is it possible that the Release Notes do not fully explain the
> > > Constraint Exclusion feature? Or is it the consensus that it works but
> > > not quite well enough to make a song and dance about yet?
> > 
> > I hardly think that the existing constraint-exclusion code is enough for
> > us to claim we "support table partitioning".  There's too much grunt
> > work that the DBA still has to do to set up a partitioning arrangement.
> 
> So you think the DBA can do partitioning? Good.
> 
> Setting up partitioning in Oracle or SQLServer2005 requires lots of
> syntax and multiple commands. There are fewer commands with PostgreSQL
> and they are ISO/ANSI compliant also.

Actually, IIRC it takes 2 commands; one to initially setup the
partitioning and one to create new partitions as needed. 3 commands if
you count DROP PARTITON.

It's been a while since I looked at what you've done, but I seem to
recall needing to manually maintain rules every time you create a new
partition.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Date:
Subject: Re: R: feature proposal ...
Next
From: AgentM
Date:
Subject: Re: R: feature proposal ...