Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From William ZHANG
Subject Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date
Msg-id 003b01c5ae93$28b2d000$1504a8c0@raymond
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
List pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: "William ZHANG" <uniware@zedware.org>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for 7.5 feature completion


> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >>* Compile with MSVC on Win32 platforms. MySQL support it.
> >>    
> >So what? It would take a major amount of work, with no useful benefits.
> 
> ... and you can compile all the client and library stuff with MSVC - 
> just not the server nor extensions. But the audience for compiling those 
> is far smaller.

I think the most popular method to build a project on Win32 is using 
MSVC or Intel C. Intel C can be integrated with MSVC's IDE to help
developers increase their productivity. Actually I have tried to make 
the backend of pgsql-8.0.3 build with MSVC 6.0, and it works well.
Should I polish it and send it as a patch?

Having been a Win32 developer for several years, I think it is more 
convenient to use MSVC's IDE than CL.exe with NMAKE.exe.
Although I do not like Microsoft very much, and like to use MinGW
or Cygwin to do some small tests, MSVC is more suitable for 
native Win32 development. If pgsql want to be the first class citizen
on Windows, and want to compete with MySQL, I think supporting 
MSVC is important. I beleive there will be many contributions from 
the Win32 world.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: broken configure, broken makefile?