Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Date
Msg-id 20050913183431.GK6026@ns.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> I'm feeling even more disenchanted with sched_yield now that Marko
> pointed out that the behavior was changed recently.  Here we have a

To be fair, I'm not entirely sure 'recently' is quite the right word.
It sounds like it changed during the 2.5 development cycle; which was
between major kernel releases, and looks like it was around Dec, 2003.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches