On 2005-09-01, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com> writes:
>> On 2005-09-01, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> There is some merit in the thought that the DB owner should be able to
>>> grant and revoke access on the public schema, but that no longer
>>> requires ownership, only membership in an appropriate role.
>
>> How would that work without superuser intervention, given that the
>> ownership of public would be the same in all databases regardless of
>> who created them?
>
> Change the ownership of public in template1 to be a "dbadmin" group.
> Grant membership in "dbadmin" to all the DB owners. End of problem.
Only if all db owners are equivalent.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
