Re: Open items list for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Open items list for 8.1
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4CC2F34@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Open items list for 8.1  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc
> G. Fournier
> Sent: 28 September 2005 00:50
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development; Neil Conway
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open items list for 8.1
>
>
> IMHO, changes like this *should not* have been allowed during
> beta, period
> ... even during feature freeze, it would have been questionable :(

Agreed. It's not like they weren't discussed to death prior to then as
well.

Whilst I'm not so wed to the changes to the others, pg_cancel_backend()
should certainly not be changed on whim - I know for a fact there are
people for whom this will cause problems.

Regards, Dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: Database file compatability
Next
From: "Ilia Kantor"
Date:
Subject: Re: effective SELECT from child tables