Re: 64-bit API for large objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 64-bit API for large objects
Date
Msg-id 13145.1127578391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit API for large objects  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: 64-bit API for large objects
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For that matter, we can't even guarantee that they work at all: not
>> all platforms even *have* int64 types.

> What platforms that PG supports don't have int64 arithmetic?

We claim to build with any ANSI C compiler, and there is no requirement
for a 64-bit type in ANSI C.

The historical project policy is that we should still build without
such a type, and everything should still work except that the effective
bounds of bigint data correspond to int32 instead of int64 limits.
I see no reason to back off that policy.  It's not very much harder
to do it right.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit API for large objects
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit API for large objects