Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT
Date
Msg-id 431880B4.5020804@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT  (Matt Miller <mattm@epx.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT
List pgsql-hackers
> I looked at EnterpriseDB a few months ago.  The installation errored.
> It left stuff in /var/opt, which I consider non-standard for a Red Hat
> machine.  The whole product just didn't feel clean to me.  I admit
> that's a pretty limited and subjective evaluation, especially for a beta
> product, but I was in the mode of broadly evaluating alternatives, so I
> moved on.  Maybe I need to look at it again.
> 
> Basically I feel more secure tracking the core project, even if I need
> to maintain some of my own patches.

The EnterpriseDB guys have a final product now, and it's designed to 
emulate Oracle as much as possible.  I'd prefer that in production than 
my own patches :)

Chris


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch