Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C79B7@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Beta2 Wrap Up ...  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each
> other, instead
> > of the old just being removed?
>
> Any change like that would require another initdb.  If we
> were going to force another initdb, my vote would be to
> revert these functions to where they were in beta1.  It was a
> mistake to change them in such a hurry.

If we want to do that, we should probably try to roll a beta3 with that
as soon as possible, so not too many people have upgraded to beta2...

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y?