Re: State of support for back PG branches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date
Msg-id 433972C9.3070301@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: State of support for back PG branches  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Steve,

> The only crystal ball involved is the assumption that if bizgres has
> Neat Stuff(tm) that would be of widespread use in it's development
> tree at that point then the odds are good that it, or something
> functionally equivalent to it, will appear in the 8.2 development
> tree. 

It certainly won't be because it hasn't been submitted.  All features 
for Bizgres PostgreSQL (as opposed to the proprietary MPP) will be sent 
to -patches.   The main difference will be the release schedule.

--Josh


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1883: Renaming a schema leaves inconsistent