Re: pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate
Date
Msg-id 200509211258.20072.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 01:10, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> pg_dump emits COMMENT ON DATABASE (if the database has a comment)
> even when dumping only an individual schema or table.  That seems
> inappropriate, especially when copying data to a different cluster
> where the named database might not exist or might have a different
> comment that shouldn't be overwritten.  Does anybody else think
> pg_dump shouldn't emit COMMENT ON DATABASE in these cases?

+1

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Cristian Prieto"
Date:
Subject: Re: R: feature proposal ...
Next
From: "Rafik Salama"
Date:
Subject: postgresql clustering