On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:22:51AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> > "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in message
> > There is a possible sequence like this:
>
> > ALIGNOF_LONG 4
> > ALIGNOF_DOUBLE 8
> > MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF 8
>
> > vs.
>
> > ALIGNOF_LONG 8
> > ALIGNOF_DOUBLE 8
> > MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF 8
>
> > So we should at least check ALIGNOF_LONG as well.
>
> No, we don't need to, because we do not really care about ALIGNOF_LONG
> per se. We don't use "long" as an on-disk datatype, precisely because
> we don't know what size it is. We use int32 and int64. The former has
> align 4 on all machines AFAIK, and the latter has MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF.
Is there a serious penalty associated with just checking them all? Seems
like better safe than sorry...
On a related note, are checks for endianness made as well?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
