Re: Version number in psql banner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Version number in psql banner
Date
Msg-id 20050902043437.GD20265@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version number in psql banner  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Version number in psql banner
Re: typo? was: Version number in psql banner
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:18:25PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com> writes:
> > > Yes I've seen the same frustration from users,  I think the banner should say
> > > something along the lines of "psql client version foo connected to server bar
> > > version sfoo" 
> > 
> > That seems overly verbose, particularly in the normal case where the
> > versions are indeed the same.  I could live with seeing a display like
> > that when the versions are different.
> 
> Thats the way Oracle sql*plus has worked for years, so its fairly
> acceptable to a great many people without too many questions.
> 
> > The other question is what counts as "different" --- do we want to
> > complain like this if the minor versions are different?
> 
> Which is much harder to define and could itself have a bug in it, so I
> prefer the verbose message.... its much better to know for certain every
> time.

I was going to mention that we should report server version info any
time we connect to a different server, though I guess \connect only
allows you to connect to a different database on the same server.

As a side note, there's a typo in \?:
 \c[onnect] [DBNAME|- [USER]]

Note the | where there should be a ].
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software        http://pervasive.com        512-569-9461


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Two different defs of MAX_TUPLES_PER_PAGE
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Version number in psql banner