Mailing lists [pgsql-advocacy]

2 February 2004

• 16:23   MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Josh Berkus
• 17:19   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Adam Ruth
• 19:14   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Robert Treat
• 23:45   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Kings-Lynne

3 February 2004

• 00:24   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? scott.marlowe
• 01:49   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jan Wieck
• 02:01   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:42   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Josh Berkus
• 02:50   Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! Josh Berkus
• 03:27   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:51   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:18   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Josh Berkus
• 04:21   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Browne
• 04:49   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 12:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jeff
• 14:51   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jeff
• 15:18   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Joshua D. Drake
• 16:01   Re: Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! Bruce Momjian
• 16:28   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? scott.marlowe
• 16:29   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jeff
• 17:48   Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Adam Ruth
• 17:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Rigmor Ukuhe
• 20:10   Re: Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! elein
• 20:19   Re: Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! Robert Bernier

4 February 2004

• 03:53   Re: Only SEVEN DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! Chris Travers
• 14:24   Re: [ [Oscon] Reminder: Feb 9 is the deadline] Jan Wieck
• 17:17   UK Linux Expo - April 2004 Oliver Elphick
• 19:13   Re: UK Linux Expo - April 2004 Richard Huxton
• 21:55   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Jan Wieck

5 February 2004

• 00:07   Last minute call for Papers Due Friday CET elein
• 01:55   We came second in ODDir.com awards Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:08   Re: We came second in ODDir.com awards Rod Taylor
• 11:10   Fwd: Re: [LIH]Bank / Financial Institutes Using Linux Shridhar Daithankar
• 15:29   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Mike Nolan
• 15:30   Fwd: Re: [LIH]Bank / Financial Institutes Using Linux Shridhar Daithankar
• 22:10   Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? Mark Harrison

6 February 2004

• 06:07   Only FOUR DAYS Until OSCON Deadline! Josh Berkus
• 14:10   firebird getting some press Robert Treat
• 15:48   Re: UK Linux Expo - April 2004 Josh Berkus
• 15:53   Re: firebird getting some press Josh Berkus
• 16:32   Re: firebird getting some press Alvaro Herrera
• 16:58   Re: Your OSCON Submission may be Lost! Re-Submit ASAP! Joe Conway
• 17:12   Your OSCON Submission may be Lost! Re-Submit ASAP! Josh Berkus
• 17:32   Re: BSDCan 2004 Dan Langille
• 17:45   Re: Your OSCON Submission may be Lost! Re-Submit Robert Treat
• 18:04   Re: UK Linux Expo - April 2004 Joshua D. Drake
• 18:54   Re: BSDCan 2004 Dan Langille
• 18:57   Re: BSDCan 2004 Josh Berkus
• 19:15   Re: Your OSCON Submission may be Lost! Re-Submit ASAP! George Essig
• 19:34   Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Andrew Sullivan
• 19:53   Re: BSDCan 2004 Geoff Davidson
• 20:06   Re: UK Linux Expo - April 2004 Richard Huxton
• 20:59   Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Robert Treat
• 23:16   Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Josh Berkus

7 February 2004

• 15:41   Re: BSDCan 2004 Christopher Browne
• 16:07   Re: BSDCan 2004 Dan Langille

8 February 2004

• 04:41   Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus
• 04:46   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Larry Rosenman
• 04:54   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus
• 04:58   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Larry Rosenman
• 04:58   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA elein
• 05:10   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Joshua Drake
• 05:15   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Christopher Browne
• 17:16   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA elein
• 18:24   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus
• 18:25   Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Josh Berkus
• 18:38   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA elein
• 18:45   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Marc G. Fournier
• 18:52   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus
• 18:57   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Neil Conway
• 19:05   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Rod Taylor
• 19:12   Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Jan Wieck
• 19:14   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Joshua Drake
• 19:15   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Joshua Drake
• 19:45   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Christopher Browne

9 February 2004

• 03:57   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Marc G. Fournier
• 04:04   First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier
• 04:31   Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Josh Berkus
• 12:12   Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Merlin Moncure
• 16:55   Re: BSDCan 2004 Jan Wieck
• 16:57   Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Joshua Drake
• 18:04   Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier
• 18:21   Re: BSDCan 2004 Dan Langille
• 18:39   Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier
• 19:05   Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... scott.marlowe

10 February 2004

• 03:07   Re: firebird getting some press Greg Sabino Mullane
• 05:49   Re: firebird getting some press Josh Berkus
• 13:09   [Fwd: [HACKERS] MS SQL features for new version] Robert Treat
• 15:04   Re: [GENERAL] I want to use postresql for this app, but... Andrew Sullivan
• 19:52   Re: [GENERAL] I want to use postresql for this app, but... Josh Berkus
• 20:16   Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but... Chris Browne

11 February 2004

• 17:17   Anyone used GForge? Josh Berkus

12 February 2004

• 17:22   Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Paul Smith
• 19:11   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Josh Berkus
• 19:47   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Robert Treat
• 20:15   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Peter Eisentraut
• 20:40   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Bruce Momjian
• 21:24   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Magnus Hagander
• 21:25   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Marc G. Fournier
• 21:27   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 21:49   PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 21:54   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Ned Lilly
• 22:14   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Alex Satrapa

13 February 2004

• 00:12   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Adam Ruth
• 04:46   Fwd: [PHP] PHP/PostGreSQL Articles Robert Treat
• 05:12   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Josh Berkus
• 10:29   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Viren Paul Smith
• 10:53   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Claudio Natoli
• 11:44   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Viren Paul Smith
• 12:14   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 17:38   Re: Fwd: [PHP] PHP/PostGreSQL Articles Joshua D. Drake
• 18:16   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Joshua D. Drake
• 18:27   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Rod Taylor
• 19:38   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Marc G. Fournier
• 20:15   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 20:56   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 21:53   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 22:07   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 22:10   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Josh Berkus

14 February 2004

• 02:14   We beat MySQL in that Poll Joshua D. Drake
• 07:47   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov
• 12:38   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille
• 14:38   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua Drake
• 14:47   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 15:37   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille
• 16:16   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Robert Treat
• 16:32   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov
• 16:53   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake
• 17:06   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 17:29   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake
• 19:07   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 19:14   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake
• 19:18   Micromuse uses PostgreSQL Robert Bernier
• 19:21   Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Andrew Dunstan
• 19:21   PostgreSQLFr.org launch / Lancement de PostgreSQLFr.org Jean-Paul ARGUDO
• 19:42   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 20:14   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov
• 21:12   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 21:19   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake
• 21:23   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake
• 22:00   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille

15 February 2004

• 06:28   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov

16 February 2004

• 19:02   Re: Clustered Postgresql Merlin Moncure
• 19:11   Re: Clustered Postgresql Rod Taylor
• 19:22   Re: Clustered Postgresql Joshua D. Drake
• 20:44   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Josh Berkus
• 22:42   pg_hba.conf elein
• 23:13   Re: pg_hba.conf Dan Langille
• 23:27   News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 23:59   Re: pg_hba.conf elein

17 February 2004

• 08:41   Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 09:43   Re: [pgsql-www] News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 14:09   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Bruce Momjian
• 14:18   Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier
• 15:26   Re: We beat MySQL in that Poll scott.marlowe

18 February 2004

• 23:28   A dubious claim to fame ... Josh Berkus

19 February 2004

• 01:14   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Larry Rosenman
• 04:03   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Josh Berkus
• 15:41   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat
• 15:44   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... scott.marlowe
• 15:58   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat
• 16:52   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Joshua D. Drake
• 16:57   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Lamar Owen
• 20:07   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat

20 February 2004

• 02:43   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Bruce Momjian
• 13:09   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat
• 16:04   Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Lamar Owen
• 18:10   plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Lane Beneke
• 20:44   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus
• 23:22   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Christopher Browne
• 23:39   Question David Costa

21 February 2004

• 00:05   Re: Question Joshua D. Drake
• 00:13   Re: Question David Costa
• 00:14   Re: Question Robert Treat
• 00:53   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus
• 00:54   Re: Question Josh Berkus
• 00:59   Re: Question David Costa
• 01:01   Re: Question David Costa
• 01:29   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Rod Taylor
• 01:31   Re: Question Joshua D. Drake
• 01:35   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Joshua D. Drake
• 05:07   LinuxWorld Call for Papers - One Week Left (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 06:34   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:15   Re: Question Chris Travers
• 13:43   Re: Question Robert Treat
• 15:00   Re: Question Rod Taylor
• 15:06   Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Magnus Hagander
• 15:10   Re: Question Shridhar Daithankar
• 15:16   Re: Question David Costa
• 15:38   [Fwd: Re: Question] Rod Taylor
• 18:28   Re: Question Joe Conway
• 19:41   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Joshua D. Drake
• 19:44   Re: Question Joshua D. Drake
• 20:56   Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus

22 February 2004

• 00:29   Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa
• 00:32   Re: Question David Costa

23 February 2004

• 12:27   PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Treat
• 13:29   Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Merlin Moncure
• 17:43   Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Bernier
• 17:46   Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison scott.marlowe
• 22:43   MySQL Licence change article - eweek Richard Huxton
• 22:50   Wired article - mostly MySQL, but also namechecks us Richard Huxton
• 22:55   Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek Ian Barwick
• 23:15   Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek Josh Berkus

24 February 2004

• 14:17   Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Merlin Moncure
• 16:48   Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Bernier
• 18:44   Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek David Costa
• 19:34   Another Postgresql mention in the media Darcy Buskermolen
• 22:00   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Gavin Sherry
• 22:10   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Dan Langille
• 23:51   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier

25 February 2004

• 01:11   OSDB.org Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:19   Re: OSDB.org Christopher Browne
• 16:54   Re: OSDB.org scott.marlowe
• 17:08   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media elein
• 17:10   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Dan Langille
• 17:23   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media David Costa
• 17:37   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Robert Treat
• 17:40   Re: OSDB.org Josh Berkus
• 17:50   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier
• 17:51   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media elein
• 17:52   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier
• 18:11   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media David Costa
• 18:20   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Robert Treat
• 19:57   Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]

26 February 2004

• 10:07   features required for SQL 92 conformance uma chingunde
• 19:33   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus
• 21:58   Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET David Costa

27 February 2004

• 00:30   features required for SQL 92 conformance Uma Chingunde
• 00:30   Re: Question Rod Taylor
• 00:30   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Troels Arvin
• 00:30   Why not fork PHP.NET Jean-Michel POURE
• 00:51   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus
• 01:13   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Neil Conway
• 01:45   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Gavin Sherry
• 03:20   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Christopher Browne
• 05:14   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus
• 11:35   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Dan Langille
• 16:10   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus
• 16:13   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Dan Langille

28 February 2004

• 19:11   Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Troels Arvin
• 22:35   Re: Question Bruce Momjian

29 February 2004

• 15:34   Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems]