Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Date
Msg-id 871xohjmlr.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Damn, yeah, you're right.  Neil was going to code something so that
> "WITH UPDATE" would automatically translate into the creation of 2-3
> rules.  But he got distracted ...

Indeed, the tragedy of being unable to work on PG full time :-)

But it hardly matters to the subject at hand: as I mentioned on IRC,
AFAIK there is *plenty* of stuff in SQL92 we don't support.

-Neil



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance