Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dan Langille
Subject Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Date
Msg-id 20040227073459.M31900@xeon.unixathome.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Chris,
>
> > Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> > standards body on this anymore.  And vendors that consider themselves
> > commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> > it seems convenient.
>
> Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
> Just ask Joe Celko ....

I haven't spoken with Joe in years.. why don't you tell us?

--
Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance