Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Date
Msg-id 200402262213.02089.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Responses Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
List pgsql-advocacy
Chris,

> Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> standards body on this anymore.  And vendors that consider themselves
> commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> it seems convenient.

Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
Just ask Joe Celko ....

--
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Next
From: Dan Langille
Date:
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance