Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 December 2005

• 02:42   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:52   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Andrew Dunstan
• 02:54   Problem with COPY CSV Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:55   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases David Fetter
• 02:59   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Qingqing Zhou
• 03:09   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Marc G. Fournier
• 03:21   Re: Problem with COPY CSV Andrew Dunstan
• 03:23   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Joshua D. Drake
• 03:39   Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Qingqing Zhou
• 04:16   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases David Fetter
• 09:22   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Richard Huxton
• 09:23   generalizing the planner knobs Neil Conway
• 09:29   Docs misspelling Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:38   Re: Docs misspelling Neil Conway
• 09:42   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 10:12   Re: Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 11:07   Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Junji TERAMOTO
• 11:09   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut
• 11:21   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Csaba Nagy
• 12:38   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Richard Huxton
• 14:07   Re: [PATCHES] A couple of proposed pgbench changes Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: Another way to reduce pg_subtrans lookup overhead Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jonah H. Harris
• 15:49   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 16:01   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Marc G. Fournier
• 16:10   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Dave Page
• 16:13   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Kenneth Marshall
• 16:13   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Kevin Grittner
• 16:14   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Kenneth Marshall
• 16:14   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Kevin Grittner
• 16:22   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Andrew Dunstan
• 16:45   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Qingqing Zhou
• 17:03   Re: [PATCHES] A couple of proposed pgbench changes Qingqing Zhou
• 17:16   Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark
• 17:18   Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark
• 17:20   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Magnus Hagander
• 17:45   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jonah H. Harris
• 19:26   Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block Tom Lane
• 19:31   Re: Strange interval arithmetic Greg Stark
• 19:43   Re: Strange interval arithmetic Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: Strange interval arithmetic Michael Fuhr
• 19:54   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 20:00   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Bruce Momjian
• 20:01   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 20:06   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane
• 20:12   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike
• 20:22   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Alvaro Herrera
• 20:31   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 20:36   Re: SHOW ALL output too wide Bruce Momjian
• 20:39   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set Bruce Momjian
• 21:19   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is Neil Conway
• 21:33   Re: Improving count(*) Bruce Momjian
• 23:23   Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane
• 23:37   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane

2 December 2005

• 01:01   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell
• 01:37   Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 01:40   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:49   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   Re: Windows installation notes Greg Sabino Mullane
• 02:03   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Stephen Frost
• 02:27   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike
• 02:37   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Neil Conway
• 03:05   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 04:17   Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Joshua D. Drake
• 04:19   Additional Grant/revoke problem Joshua D. Drake
• 05:40   Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Greg Stark
• 05:44   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 06:05   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley
• 06:09   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 06:12   Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane
• 06:15   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 06:33   Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann
• 07:18   Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Simon Riggs
• 08:40   Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY Simon Riggs
• 08:48   Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:07   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy
• 09:17   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Manfred Koizar
• 09:53   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:58   Graphics in postgress using GTK Anuj Tripathi
• 10:06   Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:30   Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Richard Huxton
• 10:36   Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Andrew Dunstan
• 10:56   Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann
• 12:08   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike
• 13:18   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 13:55   Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner
• 14:15   Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Cristian Prieto
• 14:20   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor
• 14:30   Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Jaime Casanova
• 14:42   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane
• 16:50   postgres questions (semi-joins, algebraic space) luckyghio@katamail.com
• 16:51   ... luckyghio@katamail.com
• 18:37   Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Greg Sabino Mullane
• 19:04   Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Alvaro Herrera
• 19:26   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 19:49   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 20:01   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Gregory Maxwell
• 20:23   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell
• 21:03   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 21:35   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 21:41   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten
• 21:45   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 21:45   Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 Andrew Dunstan
• 21:47   Spam 508 Simon Riggs
• 22:01   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 22:03   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley
• 22:19   Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier
• 22:33   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 22:44   strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Joe Conway
• 22:45   Re: Spam 508 Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane
• 22:59   Re: Spam 508 Jan Wieck
• 23:03   Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier
• 23:06   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway
• 23:11   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway
• 23:20   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner
• 23:40   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway
• 23:43   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane
• 23:47   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway
• 23:54   Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charles F. I. Savage

3 December 2005

• 02:09   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway
• 05:10   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner
• 07:56   Re: Spam 508 Simon Riggs
• 08:10   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 08:21   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 10:06   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner
• 11:36   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 12:14   Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs
• 12:18   snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar
• 12:47   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Robert Treat
• 13:53   Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni
• 14:15   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 14:23   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 14:46   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Neil Conway
• 14:47   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 14:54   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 15:15   Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Kevin Brown
• 15:19   unsubscribe Esha Palta
• 15:29   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 16:18   Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni
• 16:26   Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 18:38   Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs
• 18:39   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 19:15   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 20:24   SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 20:37   Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain
• 20:45   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten
• 20:47   Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan
• 20:54   Re: SERIAL type feature request Josh Berkus
• 20:59   Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage
• 21:54   Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Qingqing Zhou
• 22:06   Re: SERIAL type feature request Peter Eisentraut
• 22:24   Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage
• 22:32   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 23:40   Re: [PERFORM] Network permormance under windows (fwd) Qingqing Zhou

4 December 2005

• 02:37   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Qingqing Zhou
• 02:46   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Tom Lane
• 03:15   Re: I can't get row type from tuple (SPI) Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Tom Lane
• 05:02   Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck
• 07:59   Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni
• 12:57   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 14:49   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Alvaro Herrera
• 15:10   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 15:25   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Paul Lindner
• 15:34   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Paul Lindner
• 15:52   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 16:19   Upcoming PG re-releases Gregory Maxwell
• 17:33   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 17:48   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike
• 17:53   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 17:56   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:57   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 17:58   Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan
• 18:00   MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Paul Lindner
• 18:17   Er ... does port/snprintf.c actually work? Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 19:50   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 19:56   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 20:14   Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Bruce Momjian
• 20:28   Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan
• 20:29   Re: SERIAL type feature request Bruce Momjian
• 20:49   Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan
• 20:54   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 21:09   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 21:27   Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain
• 22:05   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 22:08   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 22:22   Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan
• 23:50   Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck
• 23:53   Re: SERIAL type feature request Michael Glaesemann
• 23:55   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark

5 December 2005

• 00:27   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark
• 00:57   Re: SERIAL type feature request Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:31   Re: MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Tom Lane
• 02:31   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 02:45   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry
• 04:21   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 05:41   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 05:45   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 05:54   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 07:28   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 07:43   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 07:46   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs
• 08:37   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig
• 12:54   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 13:03   Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Hannu Krosing
• 13:20   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 13:36   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 14:45   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:56   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown
• 15:33   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 15:47   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark
• 16:31   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy
• 16:31   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 16:38   Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian
• 16:54   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 17:10   Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck
• 17:19   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 17:31   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 18:07   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Gregory Maxwell
• 18:15   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page
• 18:28   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 18:33   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 18:38   Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 19:32   Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 19:44   *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian
• 20:06   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 20:35   Re: *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian
• 20:40   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 20:44   About varlena2 Qingqing Zhou
• 21:03   Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane
• 21:07   Re: *printf and zero size Kurt Roeckx
• 21:10   Re: About varlena2 Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 21:42   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 21:43   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne

6 December 2005

• 00:01   Re: About varlena2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 00:18   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 00:35   Re: Replication on the backend Joshua D. Drake
• 00:36   Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 02:57   Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:24   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 03:39   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian
• 04:08   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 04:21   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 04:29   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 04:36   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 04:51   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Michael Fuhr
• 05:02   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane
• 06:30   inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:44   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 06:49   Re: inet to bigint? hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 06:49   Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:05   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:08   Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:09   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:15   Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr
• 07:52   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar
• 07:59   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar
• 10:11   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page
• 11:03   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 12:12   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 12:15   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 13:12   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 13:29   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 13:50   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:11   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 14:19   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 14:38   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:39   Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 14:43   Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan
• 14:44   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 15:04   Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne
• 15:23   Re: Replication on the backend Mario Weilguni
• 15:48   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Alvaro Herrera
• 16:03   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane
• 16:09   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Bruce Momjian
• 16:20   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane
• 16:27   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor
• 17:11   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 John D. Burger
• 17:20   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane
• 17:27   Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian
• 17:33   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs
• 18:27   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 18:28   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane
• 18:32   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 18:50   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jochem van Dieten
• 18:54   Re: Replication on the backend Michael Meskes
• 19:01   Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger
• 19:04   Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger
• 19:11   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 19:13   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:25   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:29   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:29   Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Bruce Momjian
• 19:37   Slow email caught in the act Jim C. Nasby
• 19:39   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:41   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane
• 19:45   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:47   Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Bruce Momjian
• 19:47   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut
• 19:58   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 20:01   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Tom Lane
• 20:07   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 20:12   Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Tom Lane
• 20:22   more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 20:33   Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 20:33   Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander
• 20:37   Re: Replication on the backend Aly S.P Dharshi
• 21:07   Re: more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 22:01   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby
• 22:22   Re: Slow email caught in the act Marc G. Fournier
• 23:18   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark
• 23:24   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Greg Stark

7 December 2005

• 00:41   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:44   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:50   Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Michael Glaesemann
• 01:03   row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 01:22   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr
• 01:29   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:30   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Tom Lane
• 02:30   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:31   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr
• 02:31   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:31   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr
• 02:39   more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan
• 02:39   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder
• 02:46   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry
• 02:47   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Michael Fuhr
• 02:53   Feature Request: Multi-octet raw Trent Shipley
• 03:20   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 03:38   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 03:50   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark
• 04:06   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: Replication on the backend Gregory Maxwell
• 04:39   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Mark Kirkwood
• 06:43   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 06:43   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 08:23   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 08:26   Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers
• 08:27   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Harald Fuchs
• 09:04   Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers
• 09:46   Re: Replication on the backend Luke Lonergan
• 11:43   Re: Feature Request: Multi-octet raw Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:18   Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 13:33   About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Devrim GUNDUZ
• 14:37   Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Andrew Dunstan
• 16:33   Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian
• 17:01   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Jochem van Dieten
• 17:36   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Greg Stark
• 19:03   Re: [pgsql-www] About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Lamar Owen
• 19:33   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing
• 19:37   Re: Replication on the backend Andrew Sullivan
• 19:57   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Darcy Buskermolen
• 20:51   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo
• 20:59   Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 21:19   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Jonah H. Harris
• 23:14   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 23:45   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Alvaro Herrera

8 December 2005

• 01:05   Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Jan Wieck
• 01:38   HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:46   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 02:53   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 03:24   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby
• 04:35   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jim C. Nasby
• 04:59   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Tom Lane
• 05:05   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby
• 05:16   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby
• 05:58   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing
• 06:08   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby
• 06:13   Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby
• 06:34   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby
• 07:51   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Junji TERAMOTO
• 08:14   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 08:38   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 08:57   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 08:59   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing
• 09:05   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Csaba Nagy
• 10:10   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Simon Riggs
• 10:19   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? 
• 13:06   forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Merlin Moncure
• 13:44   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Bruce Momjian
• 14:05   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 14:34   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Csaba Nagy
• 15:33   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Darcy Buskermolen
• 15:39   Re: About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Jan Wieck
• 15:55   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Jan Wieck
• 16:05   Re: forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Merlin Moncure
• 16:16   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Hannu Krosing
• 16:27   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Greg Stark
• 16:35   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jaime Casanova
• 16:36   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Rod Taylor
• 16:50   bgwriter leaks resources after errors Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane
• 17:10   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 17:25   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 17:28   Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini
• 17:43   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby
• 17:57   Improving free space usage (was: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:04   Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jan Wieck
• 18:05   Re: Replication on the backend Andrew Dunstan
• 18:05   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jim C. Nasby
• 18:09   Re: bgwriter leaks resources after errors Qingqing Zhou
• 18:18   Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jim C. Nasby
• 18:18   Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck
• 18:24   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jan Wieck
• 18:32   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jonah H. Harris
• 18:33   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Dann Corbit
• 18:35   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jan Wieck
• 18:53   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jonah H. Harris
• 19:27   Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking Ron Mayer
• 20:19   Re: generic builtin functions Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: Improving free space usage (was: Reducing relation locking Hannu Krosing
• 21:19   Re: generic builtin functions Andrew Dunstan
• 21:35   8.1.1 stamped Bruce Momjian
• 21:37   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry
• 21:44   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 21:47   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Simon Riggs
• 21:54   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gregory Maxwell
• 22:08   Another encoding issue Gavin Sherry
• 23:20   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo

9 December 2005

• 00:26   Re: generic builtin functions Tom Lane
• 00:27   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Trent Shipley
• 00:41   Re: Another encoding issue Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:43   Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: Another encoding issue Tom Lane
• 00:53   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Tom Lane
• 01:03   Re: Improving free space usage (was: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jim C. Nasby
• 03:18   Warm-cache prefetching Qingqing Zhou
• 03:54   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Luke Lonergan
• 05:18   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Qingqing Zhou
• 06:54   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Min Xu (Hsu)
• 07:26   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs
• 08:10   psql patch: new host/port David Fetter
• 09:39   psql & UTF8 Teodor Sigaev
• 09:59   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Simon Riggs
• 13:10   Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Browne
• 13:17   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Bruce Momjian
• 14:37   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:18   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Jan Wieck
• 15:20   Log of CREATE USER statement Ricardo Vaz - TCESP
• 15:20   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Kenneth Marshall
• 15:20   Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner
• 15:20   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Kenneth Marshall
• 15:20   Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Kai
• 15:32   Re: psql & UTF8 Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:32   Min Xid problem proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 15:32   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Andrew Dunstan
• 15:39   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: psql & UTF8 Andrew Dunstan
• 15:44   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:58   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Simon Riggs
• 16:23   Re: Backslashes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 16:24   Re: Backslashes in string literals Peter Eisentraut
• 16:26   Re: Backslashes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 16:29   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Peter Eisentraut
• 16:38   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 16:42   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 17:03   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:28   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:37   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Peter Eisentraut
• 17:41   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Peter Eisentraut
• 17:57   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 18:07   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Tom Lane
• 18:17   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 18:21   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Qingqing Zhou
• 18:21   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Tom Lane
• 18:27   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 18:42   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian
• 20:00   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Luke Lonergan
• 20:12   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Bruce Momjian
• 20:42   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Andrew Dunstan
• 21:14   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Tom Lane
• 21:23   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Luke Lonergan
• 21:32   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Translation typo fix Peter Eisentraut
• 21:57   gcc complains about %x Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: gcc complains about %x Peter Eisentraut

10 December 2005

• 00:27   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo
• 02:34   Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:47   Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Guillaume LELARGE
• 08:31   Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Volkan YAZICI
• 09:26   Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht
• 11:23   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Simon Riggs
• 11:28   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Simon Riggs
• 13:06   Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Bruce Momjian
• 14:03   Re: Min Xid problem proposal Alvaro Herrera
• 15:15   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Tom Lane
• 15:31   pgInstaller 8.1.1 Dave Page
• 15:43   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 16:03   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Alvaro Herrera
• 16:12   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Joshua D. Drake
• 16:24   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Alvaro Herrera
• 16:25   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Alvaro Herrera
• 16:50   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Kenneth Marshall
• 16:50   Re: Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner
• 17:28   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Joshua D. Drake
• 17:42   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Bruno Wolff III
• 18:38   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Simon Riggs
• 22:50   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Robert Treat
• 23:47   Re: Warm-cache prefetching Qingqing Zhou

11 December 2005

• 00:55   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing
• 01:01   Re: Backslashes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 01:07   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane
• 01:18   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   New packages built ... Marc G. Fournier
• 04:30   Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Joshua D. Drake
• 09:52   Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A.
• 12:28   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs
• 16:19   Re: [DOCS] Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing
• 18:25   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Josh Berkus
• 19:41   Re: [DOCS] Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Tom Lane
• 20:26   Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A.
• 22:38   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Carlos Moreno
• 22:45   Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Hannu Krosing
• 22:52   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Andrew Dunstan
• 23:02   Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: Andrew Dunstan

12 December 2005

• 00:17   Re: New packages built ... F Harvell
• 01:19   Re: Adding funtions to postgresql (Not - )e: Please Help: Carlos Moreno
• 03:17   Different length lines in COPY CSV Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:56   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Bruce Momjian
• 04:43   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Tom Lane
• 05:35   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Tino Wildenhain
• 08:15   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Andrew Dunstan
• 09:15   Re: psql patch: new host/port Michael Glaesemann
• 10:32   pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 10:33   Re: psql patch: new host/port Peter Eisentraut
• 10:43   Re: psql patch: new host/port Michael Glaesemann
• 11:15   Re: psql patch: new host/port Andrew Dunstan
• 11:21   Re: psql patch: new host/port Michael Glaesemann
• 12:09   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A.
• 12:23   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Ricardo Vaz
• 12:40   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Marko Kreen
• 13:46   default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 13:52   Re: Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner
• 13:58   Re: psql patch: new host/port David Fetter
• 14:00   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Tom Lane
• 14:06   Re: default resource limits Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: Backslashes in string literals Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Pollard, Mike
• 14:19   Re: psql patch: new host/port Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: pg_relation_size locking Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 14:45   Re: pg_relation_size locking Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 14:56   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Andrew Dunstan
• 15:00   Re: psql patch: new host/port David Fetter
• 15:03   Re: pg_relation_size locking Tom Lane
• 15:05   Re: pg_relation_size locking Alvaro Herrera
• 15:10   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 15:39   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 15:42   Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 15:50   Re: Which qsort is used Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 16:11   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 16:15   Re: Which qsort is used Neil Conway
• 16:32   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 16:34   number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Volkan YAZICI
• 16:35   space for optimalization: DISTINCT without index Pavel Stehule
• 16:40   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Jan Wieck
• 16:48   Re: pg_relation_size locking Alvaro Herrera
• 16:48   Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera
• 16:51   Re: pg_relation_size locking Tom Lane
• 17:18   Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo
• 17:59   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:14   Re: pg_relation_size locking Alvaro Herrera
• 18:19   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Mike G.
• 18:30   PgInstaller error on upgrade Mike G.
• 18:44   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Guillaume LELARGE
• 19:05   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Jim C. Nasby
• 19:11   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Andrew Dunstan
• 19:17   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Frank Wiles
• 19:30   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Tino Wildenhain
• 19:40   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Jim C. Nasby
• 19:41   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:51   [Bug] Server Crash, possible security exploit, where to send security report? Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 20:19   Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS? Tom Lane
• 20:21   replan needed? Cristian Prieto
• 20:43   Re: space for optimalization: DISTINCT without index Bruno Wolff III
• 20:53   buildfarm off the air pro tem Andrew Dunstan
• 21:00   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 21:06   Re: [Bug] Server Crash, possible security exploit, where to send security report? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:12   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Jim C. Nasby
• 21:27   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Andrew Dunstan
• 21:35   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Jim C. Nasby
• 21:44   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Rod Taylor
• 21:48   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Jim C. Nasby
• 21:51   Re: space for optimalization: DISTINCT without index Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 22:00   Re: buildfarm off the air pro tem Andrew Dunstan
• 22:03   Re: buildfarm off the air pro tem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:13   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 22:25   7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 22:37   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Tom Lane
• 22:39   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Guillaume LELARGE
• 22:43   Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas Jim C. Nasby
• 22:44   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 23:21   Re: Which qsort is used Luke Lonergan

13 December 2005

• 00:02   Re: Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS? Neil Conway
• 00:05   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Andrew Dunstan
• 00:08   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 00:14   Re: Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS? Tom Lane
• 00:16   GUI Debugging on Windows Pierre Racine
• 00:16   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 00:26   Cost-based optimizers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:46   Re: pg_relation_size locking Alvaro Herrera
• 01:04   Re: Different length lines in COPY CSV Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:55   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Andrew Dunstan
• 02:39   Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals? Jim C. Nasby
• 02:39   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals? Tom Lane
• 03:38   Re: Cost-based optimizers Christopher Browne
• 03:43   Re: Which qsort is used Luke Lonergan
• 03:43   Re: Cost-based optimizers Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:07   Re: pg_relation_size locking Andreas Pflug
• 04:31   Re: Cost-based optimizers Luke Lonergan
• 05:46   Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Josh Berkus
• 05:50   Re: Which qsort is used Josh Berkus
• 05:56   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 06:03   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 06:23   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 08:43   Re: Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS? Michael Paesold
• 08:44   Re: Which qsort is used Marko Kreen
• 09:03   Deadlock with ShareLocks? Mario Weilguni
• 11:10   lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Premsun Choltanwanich
• 11:22   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Richard Huxton
• 12:09   ERROR: could not access status of transaction on postgresql 8.0.3 Malcus
• 13:42   Regression test horology failure Michael Paesold
• 14:21   Re: Anyone for adding -fwrapv to our standard CFLAGS? Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Mario Weilguni
• 14:46   Re: Regression test horology failure Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Mario Weilguni
• 15:03   Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bug] Server Crash, possible security exploit, Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 15:04   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Tom Lane
• 17:28   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 17:40   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 17:43   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 17:53   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: Regression test horology failure Michael Paesold
• 18:53   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 19:59   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 20:07   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 20:32   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 20:32   Automatic function replanning Joachim Wieland
• 20:48   Re: Automatic function replanning Neil Conway
• 22:17   New release: - kbforge 1.20 Free desktop search application with PGSQL database option kbforge@kbforge.com
• 22:31   Re: Deadlock with ShareLocks? Simon Riggs
• 22:57   Re: New release: - kbforge 1.20 Free desktop search Marc G. Fournier
• 23:11   Re: Server Crash, possible security exploit, where to send security report? Jaime Casanova
• 23:51   I am offline Bruce Momjian

14 December 2005

• 00:13   GUI Debugger for PostgreSQL on Windows Pierre Racine
• 01:34   Re: GUI Debugger for PostgreSQL on Windows Alvaro Herrera
• 02:39   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 02:46   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 02:55   Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl David Fetter
• 03:33   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl David Fetter
• 06:04   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Premsun Choltanwanich
• 07:17   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Richard Huxton
• 08:51   ANSI SQL, CASE expression Conformance F262, F263 any info Pavel Stehule
• 08:52   Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility David Fetter
• 08:58   Re: Cost-based optimizers Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:28   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:31   psql and COPY BINARY Andreas Pflug
• 12:51   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Andrew Dunstan
• 13:05   Re: Cost-based optimizers Rod Taylor
• 13:06   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Alvaro Herrera
• 14:01   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: ANSI SQL, CASE expression Conformance F262, F263 any info Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Andrew Dunstan
• 14:39   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Tom Lane
• 14:40   Interesting speed anomaly Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 14:48   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Tom Lane
• 14:55   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Richard Huxton
• 15:03   Re: Cost-based optimizers Christopher Browne
• 16:19   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Andreas Pflug
• 16:24   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Tom Lane
• 16:28   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Andreas Pflug
• 16:32   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Andreas Pflug
• 18:19   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 18:56   Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bug] Server Crash, possible security exploit, Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 21:02   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Gavin Sherry
• 21:08   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Gavin Sherry
• 21:31   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 22:36   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Mark Kirkwood
• 22:45   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Hannu Krosing

15 December 2005

• 00:17   Extended queries Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:17   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:24   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:26   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:31   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:34   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 00:35   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility David Fetter
• 00:49   Re: Refactoring psql for backward-compatibility Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:27   Improving planning of outer joins Tom Lane
• 02:02   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Premsun Choltanwanich
• 03:49   Re: Which qsort is used Luke Lonergan
• 04:07   Self-modifying code Alvaro Herrera
• 04:10   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 04:20   Re: Self-modifying code Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: Extended queries Tom Lane
• 04:50   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 05:27   Re: Extended queries Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:37   Re: Extended queries Tom Lane
• 06:14   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Mark Kirkwood
• 06:41   Re: ANSI SQL, CASE expression Conformance F262, F263 any info Pavel Stehule
• 06:43   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Mark Kirkwood
• 13:03   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Greg Stark
• 13:25   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Jim C. Nasby
• 15:57   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Jim C. Nasby
• 16:02   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 16:06   Re: Which qsort is used Jim C. Nasby
• 16:13   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 16:36   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 17:16   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Robert Treat
• 17:29   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Andrew Dunstan
• 17:31   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Tom Lane
• 19:02   Re: 7.3 failure on platypus Jim C. Nasby
• 21:12   postgres version control? Amit Kulkarni
• 21:21   Re: postgres version control? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:26   Re: Interesting speed anomaly Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 21:46   Re: Which qsort is used Greg Stark
• 22:07   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 22:15   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou

16 December 2005

• 01:02   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 01:19   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:20   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:25   Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 04:36   Re: Which qsort is used Luke Lonergan
• 04:53   Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 07:05   Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 13:03   Re: Which qsort is used Jeff Trout
• 17:48   I am back online Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Web archive issue? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:20   Re: Web archive issue? Marc G. Fournier
• 18:41   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Simon Riggs
• 18:47   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Simon Riggs
• 18:56   Re: Web archive issue? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:12   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Alvaro Herrera
• 19:18   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Tom Lane
• 19:24   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Alvaro Herrera
• 19:33   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: Web archive issue? Jim C. Nasby
• 21:00   Re: Self-modifying code Alvaro Herrera
• 21:36   second "begin transaction" emits a warning Jaime Casanova
• 21:56   reducing bloat in pg_statistic Robert Treat
• 22:11   Re: second "begin transaction" emits a warning Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: second "begin transaction" emits a warning Robert Treat
• 22:23   Re: reducing bloat in pg_statistic Tom Lane

17 December 2005

• 00:08   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Bruce Momjian
• 00:14   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 00:17   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 00:56   Re: number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Bruce Momjian
• 01:15   Re: Which qsort is used Mark Kirkwood
• 03:11   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 04:23   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 05:13   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Qingqing Zhou
• 05:15   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 05:41   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Tom Lane
• 05:44   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 13:19   Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Volkan YAZICI
• 14:07   Re: psql and COPY BINARY Bruce Momjian
• 16:52   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 17:12   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: number of loaded/unloaded COPY rows Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Smith

18 December 2005

• 01:04   Re: Automatic function replanning Chris Browne
• 01:17   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Peter Eisentraut
• 02:59   Re: Automatic function replanning Tom Lane
• 05:38   Re: Automatic function replanning Christopher Browne
• 05:38   Re: Automatic function replanning Christopher Browne
• 12:05   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: Log of CREATE USER statement Andreas Pflug

19 December 2005

• 00:32   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Peter Eisentraut
• 02:16   Re: Automatic function replanning Trent Shipley
• 04:20   Recovery from multi trouble OKADA Satoshi
• 04:21   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:27   Re: Recovery from multi trouble Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 07:17   Re: Recovery from multi trouble OKADA Satoshi
• 07:51   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 07:59   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:16   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 08:38   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:32   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 09:42   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:51   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 10:38   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:07   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Magnus Hagander
• 11:48   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:10   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Andreas Pflug
• 13:12   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 13:49   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Magnus Hagander
• 13:53   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 14:00   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 16:36   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Luke Lonergan
• 16:43   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Andrew Dunstan
• 18:00   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 21:30   Trouble building 8.1.1 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Albert Chin
• 21:41   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Andreas Pflug
• 21:56   free Sun T2000 for PostgreSQL community? Michael Adler
• 21:59   Re: Trouble building 8.1.1 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Tom Lane
• 22:20   Re: Trouble building 8.1.1 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Albert Chin
• 22:33   Lock issue when trying to vacuum db Jess Balint
• 22:34   Re: Trouble building 8.1.1 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Tom Lane
• 22:41   Re: Trouble building 8.1.1 on Tru64 UNIX 5.1 Albert Chin

20 December 2005

• 00:30   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:01   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Alvaro Herrera
• 01:06   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:03   Re: Lock issue when trying to vacuum db Tom Lane
• 02:51   localization problem (and solution) Manuel Sugawara
• 03:32   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 03:36   Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 Premsun Choltanwanich
• 04:11   Re: Lock issue when trying to vacuum db Jess Balint
• 04:32   Re: localization problem (and solution) Manuel Sugawara
• 07:17   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 16:15   Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:21   Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET Tom Lane
• 16:30   Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET Greg Sabino Mullane
• 16:44   Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: Automatic function replanning Rick Gigger
• 20:42   status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... Hans-Jürgen Schönig
• 21:18   Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane

21 December 2005

• 04:22   I am back online again Bruce Momjian
• 06:06   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andreas Seltenreich
• 06:50   Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... Hannu Krosing
• 10:00   Windows Installer Bug (Probably) Ilias Goudaropoulos
• 13:49   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 14:51   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 14:53   Better path-matching for package relocatability (was Re: [BUGS] horology regression test failure) Tom Lane
• 15:04   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 15:17   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 16:44   pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan
• 16:44   Function call with offset and limit REYNAUD Jean-Samuel
• 16:45   replicating tsearch2 across versions of postgres Dave Cramer
• 17:16   where is the output ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 17:32   Re: where is the output Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:04   Re: replicating tsearch2 across versions of postgres Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 18:41   Re: Function call with offset and limit Jim C. Nasby
• 18:52   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Jaime Casanova
• 19:20   problem with nasty latin2 sorting Anna Domachowska
• 19:23   Re: where is the output Michael Fuhr
• 20:37   Re: replicating tsearch2 across versions of postgres Dave Cramer
• 20:59   Re: problem with nasty latin2 sorting Greg Stark
• 21:44   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... Hannu Krosing
• 22:14   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:40   Re: problem with nasty latin2 sorting Tom Lane
• 23:00   Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Simon Riggs
• 23:07   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Tom Lane
• 23:43   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Manfred Koizar
• 23:54   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby

22 December 2005

• 01:03   Re: Improving planning of outer joins Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:03   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:12   catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake
• 01:31   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Bruce Momjian
• 02:24   to_char and i18n Manuel Sugawara
• 02:29   Re: Better path-matching for package relocatability (was Re: Bruce Momjian
• 02:37   Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane
• 02:48   Re: to_char and i18n Qingqing Zhou
• 03:00   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 03:17   Re: to_char and i18n Tom Lane
• 03:18   Re: to_char and i18n Manuel Sugawara
• 03:27   Re: to_char and i18n Manuel Sugawara
• 03:28   Re: to_char and i18n Tom Lane
• 03:36   Re: to_char and i18n Qingqing Zhou
• 03:38   Re: to_char and i18n Bruce Momjian
• 03:50   Re: to_char and i18n Tom Lane
• 04:06   Re: to_char and i18n Manuel Sugawara
• 04:10   Re: to_char and i18n Gavin Sherry
• 04:57   Re: to_char and i18n Manuel Sugawara
• 06:01   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Martijn van Oosterhout
• 07:28   Re: to_char and i18n Karel Zak
• 07:36   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Smith
• 08:18   PL/pgSQL proposal: using list of scalars in assign stmts, fore and fors stmts Pavel Stehule
• 08:53   Re: Function call with offset and limit REYNAUD Jean-Samuel
• 09:19   Re: Function call with offset and limit Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:41   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Simon Riggs
• 09:53   Re: Recovery from multi trouble Simon Riggs
• 11:18   Re: Recovery from multi trouble Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:10   Re: replicating tsearch2 across versions of postgres Dave Cramer
• 12:59   Re: to_char and i18n Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 13:31   WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Simon Riggs
• 14:40   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:00   Re: PL/pgSQL proposal: using list of scalars in assign stmts, fore and fors stmts Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Tom Lane
• 17:37   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Jim C. Nasby
• 17:38   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Jim C. Nasby
• 19:02   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Alvaro Herrera
• 19:04   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 19:10   Re: WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Simon Riggs
• 19:11   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Tom Lane
• 19:15   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 19:18   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:48   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Smith
• 19:53   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 19:55   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Smith
• 20:06   Re: PL/pgSQL proposal: using list of scalars in assign stmts, fore and fors stmts David Fetter
• 20:10   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 20:11   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Smith
• 20:18   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 20:20   Re: Automatic function replanning Jim C. Nasby
• 20:22   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 20:28   Re: Automatic function replanning Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 20:40   Re: Function call with offset and limit Jim C. Nasby
• 20:58   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Manfred Koizar
• 21:05   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Simon Riggs
• 21:13   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 21:21   Re: Re: Which qsort is used Dann Corbit
• 21:35   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Stephen Frost
• 22:02   Re: Automatic function replanning Trent Shipley
• 22:06   Re: Automatic function replanning Bruce Momjian
• 22:10   Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] Solaris cc compiler on amd: PostgreSQL does not Bruce Momjian
• 22:11   Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Ashok Agrawal
• 22:19   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Bruce Momjian
• 22:29   Re: PL/pgSQL proposal: using list of scalars in assign stmts, fore and fors stmts Tom Lane
• 22:32   what is the smallest working page size for postgresql Hannu Krosing
• 22:32   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Hannu Krosing
• 22:35   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Bruce Momjian
• 22:49   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Andrew Dunstan
• 22:51   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou
• 22:53   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: PL/pgSQL proposal: using list of scalars in assign Andrew Dunstan
• 23:04   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou
• 23:25   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Ashok Agrawal
• 23:29   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Bruce Momjian
• 23:52   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou

23 December 2005

• 00:21   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 01:00   Re: what is the smallest working page size for postgresql Qingqing Zhou
• 01:00   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 03:13   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 04:19   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 04:40   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Tom Lane
• 09:18   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 12:19   Re: where is the output ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 12:56   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 13:13   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Greg Stark
• 13:28   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:41   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Stephen Frost
• 14:08   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Marko Kreen
• 14:24   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:54   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Stephen Frost
• 15:17   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Andrew Dunstan
• 15:39   Spaces in directory names Peter Eisentraut
• 15:41   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Magnus Hagander
• 15:42   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Dave Page
• 17:06   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption Stephen Frost
• 17:14   Re: kerberos/SSPI (was: Client-side password encryption) Magnus Hagander
• 18:15   postmaster and postgres options assimilation Peter Eisentraut
• 18:32   Re: postmaster and postgres options assimilation Tom Lane
• 19:18   Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: where is the output Michael Fuhr
• 19:37   Questions related to xlog Qingqing Zhou
• 20:52   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Bruce Momjian
• 21:14   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Jonah H. Harris
• 21:25   Re: Questions related to xlog Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: Questions related to xlog Qingqing Zhou
• 22:27   PLs and domain constraints Neil Conway
• 22:38   Re: PLs and domain constraints Tom Lane
• 22:58   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan

24 December 2005

• 01:37   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou
• 02:00   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 02:29   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou
• 02:41   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 02:49   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Qingqing Zhou
• 03:06   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 03:19   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Rod Taylor
• 06:01   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 07:24   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:25   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:30   bugs with certain Asian multibyte charsets Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:55   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:06   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 09:10   Missing DATE selectivity Simon Riggs
• 09:46   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:25   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Peter Eisentraut
• 10:50   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:19   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 13:38   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 14:32   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 14:48   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 16:19   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 19:20   Merry Christmas! Joshua D. Drake
• 19:47   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Manfred Koizar
• 23:14   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Kevin Brown
• 23:29   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 23:56   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Alvaro Herrera

25 December 2005

• 00:50   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Tom Lane
• 01:01   Re: Unsplitting btree index leaf pages Tom Lane
• 03:29   Happy Holidays Andy Astor
• 12:02   Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger
• 12:10   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:56   Re: to_char and i18n Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 21:03   Re: Incremental Backup Script Qingqing Zhou
• 22:19   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan

26 December 2005

• 10:08   Re: Incremental Backup Script Simon Riggs
• 10:54   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Bruce Momjian
• 10:57   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Bruce Momjian
• 11:07   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 11:22   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:29   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Pavel Stehule
• 11:40   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:04   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 15:10   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Tom Lane
• 16:09   Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane
• 16:39   Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane
• 16:55   Online backup vs Continuous backup Bruce Momjian
• 17:08   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 17:26   Re: [PATCHES] to_char and i18n Karel Zak
• 17:44   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Tom Lane
• 18:02   Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup Joshua D. Drake
• 18:07   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 18:51   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Pavel Stehule
• 18:51   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Heikki Linnakangas
• 19:12   Fixing row comparison semantics Gregory Maxwell
• 19:39   Pushing init scripts into contrib/ Devrim GUNDUZ
• 20:13   Re: Pushing init scripts into contrib/ Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: Pushing init scripts into contrib/ Andrew Dunstan
• 20:20   Re: Pushing init scripts into contrib/ Joshua D. Drake
• 20:31   Re: Pushing init scripts into contrib/ Devrim GUNDUZ
• 20:45   Case Conversion Functions Volkan YAZICI
• 20:48   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:49   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 23:01   Re: Case Conversion Functions Tom Lane

27 December 2005

• 11:18   Handling of build-time enabled GUC settings Peter Eisentraut
• 11:50   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Peter Eisentraut
• 12:29   Proposed COLLATE implementation Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:41   Re: Possible savepoint bug Michael Paesold
• 16:07   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Jim C. Nasby
• 16:19   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Jim C. Nasby
• 16:45   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Bruce Momjian
• 16:54   Re: Handling of build-time enabled GUC settings Bruce Momjian
• 17:22   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:59   Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup Greg Stark
• 18:36   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup Andrew Dunstan
• 19:51   Re: Possible savepoint bug Tom Lane
• 20:44   Re: Oracle PL/SQL Anonymous block equivalent in postgres Pavel Stehule
• 21:22   Re: Possible savepoint bug Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Hannu Krosing
• 21:47   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Hannu Krosing
• 22:30   Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup Greg Stark
• 22:57   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Andrew Dunstan
• 23:30   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane

28 December 2005

• 02:32   sending mail from Postgres Aftab Alam
• 03:00   Re: Missing DATE selectivity Bruce Momjian
• 04:20   Re: sending mail from Postgres Pavel Stehule
• 05:01   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is redundant Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 07:51   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:38   Re: Possible savepoint bug Michael Paesold
• 13:26   Re: sending mail from Postgres Jeremy Drake
• 14:35   plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 16:13   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan
• 18:22   Re: Fixing row comparison semantics Bruno Wolff III
• 19:21   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mention "table" in "violates foreign key constraint" message that Rocco Altier
• 20:40   FATAL: failed to initialize TimeZone to "UNKNOWN" Volkan YAZICI
• 21:06   Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 22:26   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin translation to italian language Hiroshi Saito
• 23:38   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Tom Lane
• 23:53   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan

29 December 2005

• 00:11   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 00:34   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 00:58   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 01:12   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 01:45   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 02:05   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Joshua D. Drake
• 03:09   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 03:53   Re: sending mail from Postgres David Fetter
• 06:01   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is Neil Conway
• 06:13   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Minor doc tweak: "NOT NULL" is Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:48   Re: [GENERAL] WAL logs multiplexing? Dmitry Panov
• 08:33   Re: localization problem (and solution) Magnus Hagander
• 08:34   Re: localization problem (and solution) Magnus Hagander
• 08:43   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 09:19   FW: PGBuildfarm member snake Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to Make failure Dave Page
• 10:00   Re: Missing DATE selectivity Simon Riggs
• 10:58   Re: [GENERAL] WAL logs multiplexing? Simon Riggs
• 12:19   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 13:31   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 13:35   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Rod Taylor
• 14:10   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 14:49   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Tom Lane
• 14:52   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Andrew Dunstan
• 15:00   Re: Missing DATE selectivity Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 15:14   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 15:37   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 15:45   Re: Missing DATE selectivity Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 16:16   Re: to_char and i18n Bruce Momjian
• 16:17   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 16:20   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 16:31   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 16:50   Fwd: Re: [ADMIN] migrating oracle table to PostgresQL Robert Treat
• 17:50   Re: localization problem (and solution) Tom Lane
• 18:15   broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Sebastian
• 18:26   Re: localization problem (and solution) Andrew Dunstan
• 18:57   Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Michael Paesold
• 18:58   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Michael Fuhr
• 19:12   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Sebastian
• 19:59   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Michael Fuhr
• 20:15   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Larry Rosenman
• 20:49   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Sebastian
• 21:31   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout

30 December 2005

• 01:35   Re: Fwd: Re: [ADMIN] migrating oracle table to PostgresQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:00   Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices Bruce Momjian
• 02:14   Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices Bruce Momjian
• 04:08   EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 04:34   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 04:42   Re: Fwd: Re: [ADMIN] migrating oracle table to PostgresQL Robert Treat
• 07:15   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Sebastian
• 12:10   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 12:35   Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup Simon Riggs
• 13:36   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Andrew Dunstan
• 13:57   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:18   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Tom Lane
• 15:50   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Andrew Dunstan
• 16:58   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 17:02   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Michael Fuhr
• 17:32   Permissions vs SERIAL columns Magnus Hagander
• 17:36   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 20:02   Anonymous CVS having problems? Michael Fuhr
• 20:15   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 20:37   Re: Anonymous CVS having problems? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:41   Re: Anonymous CVS having problems? Marc G. Fournier
• 20:46   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:36   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 21:46   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs
• 21:53   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 21:55   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Michael Fuhr
• 22:04   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Greg Stark
• 22:09   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian
• 22:46   Re: broken 'SHOW TABLE'-like query works in 8, not 8.1.1 Sebastian

31 December 2005

• 00:25   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 04:58   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Greg Stark
• 05:29   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 06:10   pgAdmin translation to italian language Michele Pigozzo
• 09:39   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 10:59   Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Michael Paesold
• 18:41   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 18:48   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Rod Taylor
• 18:54   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Tom Lane
• 19:56   Re: Removing SORTFUNC_LT/REVLT Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:57   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 20:46   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 20:51   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:02   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 21:21   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Qingqing Zhou
• 23:03   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Greg Stark
• 23:04   Re: [PATCHES] default resource limits Tom Lane
• 23:46   Re: EINTR error in SunOS Doug Royer