Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Premsun Choltanwanich
Subject Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1
Date
Msg-id 43A13931.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you Tom. I will test it and reply the result as information for other. But it may a week for that cause many work in end of year.

>>> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 12/14/2005 22:06:33 >>>
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th> writes:
> I think I use contrib/lo type  for manage lo. What is wrong?

You need to use the 8.1 version of contrib/lo, not any previous version.

You might find that the easiest way to manage this is to create an empty
database, load the 8.1 contrib/lo definitions by running lo.sql, then
restoring from your pg_dump backup.  You'll see some complaints about
duplicate function definitions but these can be ignored.

regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Improving planning of outer joins
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Which qsort is used