Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1
Date
Msg-id 19290.1134572793@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1  ("Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th>)
Responses Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1  ("Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th>)
Re: lo function changed in PostgreSQL 8.1.1  ("Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th> writes:
> I think I use contrib/lo type  for manage lo. What is wrong?

You need to use the 8.1 version of contrib/lo, not any previous version.

You might find that the easiest way to manage this is to create an empty
database, load the 8.1 contrib/lo definitions by running lo.sql, then
restoring from your pg_dump backup.  You'll see some complaints about
duplicate function definitions but these can be ignored.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Immodest Proposal: pg_catalog.pg_ddl
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ANSI SQL, CASE expression Conformance F262, F263 any info