Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
Date
Msg-id 2635.1134429209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas  (Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
List pgsql-hackers
Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com> writes:
> I've made more tests on schemas. I'm able to drop information_schema and 
> public schemas but I can't drop pg_catalog and pg_toast. It makes me think 
> that only pg_* are system schemas and that public and information_schema are 
> public schemas. Am I right on this one ?

Yeah, both of the latter are intentionally droppable because nothing in
the core server depends on them.  The C code is explicitly aware of both
pg_catalog and pg_toast, so those are pinned.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm off the air pro tem
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: 7.3 failure on platypus