Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Guillaume LELARGE
Subject Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
Date
Msg-id 200512130043.08276.guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:13, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com> writes:
> > I've made more tests on schemas. I'm able to drop information_schema and
> > public schemas but I can't drop pg_catalog and pg_toast. It makes me
> > think that only pg_* are system schemas and that public and
> > information_schema are public schemas. Am I right on this one ?
>
> Yeah, both of the latter are intentionally droppable because nothing in
> the core server depends on them.  The C code is explicitly aware of both
> pg_catalog and pg_toast, so those are pinned.
>

Thanks for your answer.


--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/    http://lfs.traduc.org/    http://traduc.postgresqlfr.org/ -->



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas