Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com> writes:
>> BTW, there's another end to the 'enable_seqscan=false' problem... it
>> sometimes doesn't work!
> I have often considered that this is an indication that seq scan is
> actually the better plan...
There are cases where it is the *only* plan, eg, you have no relevant
indexes. I am not sure that applies to Jim's complaint though.
regards, tom lane
